Wearable Spine Tracker vs. Video-Based Pose Estimation for Human Activity Recognition

This paper presents a comparative study for detecting the activities of daily living (ADLs) using two distinct sensor systems: the FlexTail wearable spine tracker and a camera-based pose estimation model. We developed a protocol to simultaneously record data with both systems and capture eleven activities from general movement, household, and food handling. We tested a comprehensive selection of state-of-the-art time series classification algorithms. Both systems achieved high classification performance, with average F1 scores of 0.90 for both datasets using a 1-second time window and the random dilated shapelet transform (RDST) and QUANT classifier for FlexTail and camera data, respectively. We also explored the impact of hierarchical activity grouping and found that while it improved classification performance in some cases, the benefits were not consistent across all activities. Our findings suggest that both sensor systems recognize ADLs. The FlexTail model performs better for detecting sitting and transitions, like standing up, while the camera-based model is better for activities that involve arm and hand movements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25123806
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wearable Spine Tracker vs. Video-Based Pose Estimation for Human Activity Recognition

Jonas Walkling, Thomas Martin Deserno, Luca Sander, Arwed Masch
1 citations
Sensors
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
1.28
article

Wearable Spine Tracker vs. Video-Based Pose Estimation for Human Activity Recognition

Jonas Walkling, Thomas Martin Deserno, Luca Sander, Arwed Masch
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study for detecting the activities of daily living (ADLs) using two distinct sensor systems: the FlexTail wearable spine tracker and a camera-based pose estimation model. We developed a protocol to simultaneously record data with both systems and capture eleven activities from general movement, household, and food handling. We tested a comprehensive selection of state-of-the-art time series classification algorithms. Both systems achieved high classification performance, with average F1 scores of 0.90 for both datasets using a 1-second time window and the random dilated shapelet transform (RDST) and QUANT classifier for FlexTail and camera data, respectively. We also explored the impact of hierarchical activity grouping and found that while it improved classification performance in some cases, the benefits were not consistent across all activities. Our findings suggest that both sensor systems recognize ADLs. The FlexTail model performs better for detecting sitting and transitions, like standing up, while the camera-based model is better for activities that involve arm and hand movements.

SensorsVol. 25(12)
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Volkswagen Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wearable Spine Tracker vs. Video-Based Pose Estimation for Human Activity Recognition — Jonas Walkling, Thomas Martin Deserno, et al. · Sensors (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS