A Conceptual Framework to Embed Sustainability in the Curricula of a UK University
This paper presents a conceptual framework for strategic approaches to embedding sustainability in the curriculum at a large research-intensive university. Due to the evolving nature of universities and technology, this journey is never complete, and this paper presents a case study of our approach to driving the work forward. This ambition is part of the institution’s Environmental Policy to ‘monitor and increase the integration with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) across our operations, research, and education programmes.’ Our conceptual framework to support embedding in the curriculum guides operationalisation across five key domains: 1. strategy, policy, and principles; 2. institution-wide curriculum change; 3. active and authentic education activities; 4. staff development; and 5. community building. For example, an institution-wide curriculum initiative to redesign the Queen Mary graduate attributes framework was developed to include the attribute ‘Promote socially responsible behaviour for a global sustainable future.’ To gain this attribute means that our graduates are exposed to discussions and knowledge concerning sustainability. Across these five areas, we argue that a strategic approach is necessary for successful and impactful embedding of sustainability in the curriculum. Work across each domain needs to be closely linked and interconnected, and to build links with existing policy, strategy, and frameworks. This approach needs to combine high-level leadership together with support for grass-roots initiatives.
Authors
- Janet De Wilde (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1914-3891)
- Stephanie Fuller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6740-3539)
- Zoe Sturgess
Institutions
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Mile End Hospital (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-06-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125605
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Sustainability in Higher Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.93
Funders
- Queen Mary University of London