Midwifery and the Politicized Logic of “Sex-Based” Childbirth Discourse

Some midwives and related professionals agree with concerns expressed in the popular media about the removal of the “sexed terms” woman and mother from reproductive healthcare discourse. They contend that while gender may be chosen and diverse, biological or reproductive sex is immutable and anatomically based. It follows, they claim, that while we may affirm people’s gender choices, binary sex ought to be the identifying factor in reproductive healthcare, research, and advocacy. Sex-based language advocates also make the unexamined metaphysical assumption that reality is material and natural and that sex is on this unshakable, grounding level. In contrast, I argue that they ignore the true complexity and diversity of sex/gender differentiation and are motivated by their own situated, politicized gender identity. These beliefs result in measurable reproductive harm to trans, nonbinary, and other gender diverse individuals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754251352598
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Midwifery and the Politicized Logic of “Sex-Based” Childbirth Discourse

Sarah LaChance Adams
Alternatives Global Local Political
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Midwifery and the Politicized Logic of “Sex-Based” Childbirth Discourse

Sarah LaChance Adams
article en

Abstract

Some midwives and related professionals agree with concerns expressed in the popular media about the removal of the “sexed terms” woman and mother from reproductive healthcare discourse. They contend that while gender may be chosen and diverse, biological or reproductive sex is immutable and anatomically based. It follows, they claim, that while we may affirm people’s gender choices, binary sex ought to be the identifying factor in reproductive healthcare, research, and advocacy. Sex-based language advocates also make the unexamined metaphysical assumption that reality is material and natural and that sex is on this unshakable, grounding level. In contrast, I argue that they ignore the true complexity and diversity of sex/gender differentiation and are motivated by their own situated, politicized gender identity. These beliefs result in measurable reproductive harm to trans, nonbinary, and other gender diverse individuals.

Alternatives Global Local PoliticalVol. 51(1)
University of North Florida (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.