A Tale of Dynamical Instabilities and Giant Impacts in the Exoplanet Radius Valley

Abstract The size distribution of planets with radii between 1 R ⊕ and 4 R ⊕ peaks near 1.4 R ⊕ and 2.2 R ⊕ , with a dip around 1.8 R ⊕ —the so-called “radius valley.” Recent statistical analyses suggest that planets within this valley (1.5 < R < 2 R ⊕ ) tend to have slightly higher orbital eccentricities than those outside it. The origin of this dynamical signature remains unclear. We revisit the “breaking the chains” formation model and propose that late dynamical instabilities—occurring after disk dispersal—may account for the elevated eccentricities observed in the radius valley. Our simulations show that subvalley planets ( R < 2 R ⊕ ) are generally rocky, while those beyond the valley ( R > 2 R ⊕ ) are typically water-rich. Rocky planets that undergo strong dynamical instabilities and numerous late giant impacts have their orbits excited and their radii increased, ultimately placing them into the radius valley. In contrast, the larger, water-rich planets just beyond the valley experience weaker instabilities and fewer impacts, resulting in lower eccentricities. This contrast leads to a peak in the eccentricity distribution within the valley. The extent to which planets in the radius valley are dynamically excited depends sensitively on the orbital architecture before the orbital instability. Elevated eccentricities among radius valley planets arise primarily in scenarios that form a sufficiently large number of rocky planets within 100 days (typically ≳5) prior to instability, and that also host external perturbers ( P > 100 days), which further amplify the strength of dynamical instabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/adde51
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tale of Dynamical Instabilities and Giant Impacts in the Exoplanet Radius Valley

S. Shibata, André Izidoro
3 citations
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
3.46
article

A Tale of Dynamical Instabilities and Giant Impacts in the Exoplanet Radius Valley

S. Shibata, André Izidoro
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The size distribution of planets with radii between 1 R ⊕ and 4 R ⊕ peaks near 1.4 R ⊕ and 2.2 R ⊕ , with a dip around 1.8 R ⊕ —the so-called “radius valley.” Recent statistical analyses suggest that planets within this valley (1.5 < R < 2 R ⊕ ) tend to have slightly higher orbital eccentricities than those outside it. The origin of this dynamical signature remains unclear. We revisit the “breaking the chains” formation model and propose that late dynamical instabilities—occurring after disk dispersal—may account for the elevated eccentricities observed in the radius valley. Our simulations show that subvalley planets ( R < 2 R ⊕ ) are generally rocky, while those beyond the valley ( R > 2 R ⊕ ) are typically water-rich. Rocky planets that undergo strong dynamical instabilities and numerous late giant impacts have their orbits excited and their radii increased, ultimately placing them into the radius valley. In contrast, the larger, water-rich planets just beyond the valley experience weaker instabilities and fewer impacts, resulting in lower eccentricities. This contrast leads to a peak in the eccentricity distribution within the valley. The extent to which planets in the radius valley are dynamically excited depends sensitively on the orbital architecture before the orbital instability. Elevated eccentricities among radius valley planets arise primarily in scenarios that form a sufficiently large number of rocky planets within 100 days (typically ≳5) prior to instability, and that also host external perturbers ( P > 100 days), which further amplify the strength of dynamical instabilities.

The Astrophysical Journal LettersVol. 986(2)
Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.