Stosowanie zasad procesu karnego do przesłuchań przed sejmowymi komisjami śledczymi

Witness testimony is the primary means of evidence in many types of proceedings, but before the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry, it plays an exceptionally important role. As the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure apply accordingly to the proceedings before the committees, it is important to consider whether the principles of a criminal trial should also be followed. The article will discuss such a possibility, based on the interpretation of the concept of “appropriate use”. In the context of the right to defence and the principle of directness, the right of a witness to request free speech will be analysed. The issue of the principle of objectivity will be considered – whether the commission’s questions and actions can realise this principle’s assumptions at all.The summary will include demands for the committees to properly apply the law. This is because, despite their political nature, it is to be expected that the regulations applied will retain their essence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31261/ppk.2025.09.02.02
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stosowanie zasad procesu karnego do przesłuchań przed sejmowymi komisjami śledczymi

Paweł Dzialuk
Problemy Prawa Karnego
Ombudsman and Human Rights
article

Stosowanie zasad procesu karnego do przesłuchań przed sejmowymi komisjami śledczymi

Paweł Dzialuk
article en

Abstract

Witness testimony is the primary means of evidence in many types of proceedings, but before the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry, it plays an exceptionally important role. As the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure apply accordingly to the proceedings before the committees, it is important to consider whether the principles of a criminal trial should also be followed. The article will discuss such a possibility, based on the interpretation of the concept of “appropriate use”. In the context of the right to defence and the principle of directness, the right of a witness to request free speech will be analysed. The issue of the principle of objectivity will be considered – whether the commission’s questions and actions can realise this principle’s assumptions at all.The summary will include demands for the committees to properly apply the law. This is because, despite their political nature, it is to be expected that the regulations applied will retain their essence.

Problemy Prawa Karnego
Kozminski University (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Stosowanie zasad procesu karnego do przesłuchań przed sejmowymi komisjami śledczymi — Paweł Dzialuk · Problemy Prawa Karnego (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS