A Comparative View of the Comprehensive Sickness Insurance Condition for Residence in Article 7 of Directive 2004/38

The Citizenship Directive 2004/38 provides for a right of residence for more than three months and up to five years for EEA nationals and their family members in other EEA states, subject (amongst other things) to a requirement of “comprehensive” sickness insurance during one’s stay. Yet what does “comprehensive” mean under EU and EEA law? How has this been interpreted by the CJEU and/or EFTA Court? And how is the requirement understood and applied at national level? These are the main issues discussed in the following article, which reveals a surprisingly high level of disparity in terms of interpretation and application of the requirement at national level in Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Sweden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of European Law
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36969/njel.v8i2.27805
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative View of the Comprehensive Sickness Insurance Condition for Residence in Article 7 of Directive 2004/38

Jaan Paju, Georges Baur, Christian Nk Franklin, عبدالعزيز بن عبدالله البريثن
Nordic Journal of European Law
European and International Law Studies
article

A Comparative View of the Comprehensive Sickness Insurance Condition for Residence in Article 7 of Directive 2004/38

Jaan Paju, Georges Baur, Christian Nk Franklin, عبدالعزيز بن عبدالله البريثن
article en

Abstract

The Citizenship Directive 2004/38 provides for a right of residence for more than three months and up to five years for EEA nationals and their family members in other EEA states, subject (amongst other things) to a requirement of “comprehensive” sickness insurance during one’s stay. Yet what does “comprehensive” mean under EU and EEA law? How has this been interpreted by the CJEU and/or EFTA Court? And how is the requirement understood and applied at national level? These are the main issues discussed in the following article, which reveals a surprisingly high level of disparity in terms of interpretation and application of the requirement at national level in Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Sweden.

Nordic Journal of European LawVol. 8(2)
Reykjavík University (IS), Liechtenstein Institute (LI), Stockholm University (SE), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative View of the Comprehensive Sickness Insurance Condition for Residence in Article 7 of Directive 2004/38 — Jaan Paju, Georges Baur, et al. · Nordic Journal of European Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS