The 2024 Alþingi election: Is extreme electoral volatility the new norm?

The 2024 Alþingi election resulted in substantial losses for the coalition government that had ruled Iceland since 2017. The three governing parties (the Left-Green Movement, Independence Party, and Progressive Party) secured a combined 29.5% of the vote, down from 54.3% three years earlier. We present an analysis of the 2024 election, informed by preliminary results from the Icelandic National Election Study. We examine the 2024 election through the theoretical lenses of economic voting and the cost of ruling, and place our findings in the context of post-crisis Icelandic electoral politics. Our analysis indicates that the 2024 election campaign was dominated by economic considerations, adversely affecting the governing parties. Economic concerns likely contributed to high levels of electoral volatility, as nearly half (49%) of all voters switched parties between 2021 and 2024. Governing parties lost badly and opposition parties (aside from parties furthest to the left) gained votes. The election results are also explored in terms of issue salience, post-crisis trends in political attitudes and behaviour, and voters’ media use. Our findings align with the established trend of a high cost of ruling in post-crisis Icelandic politics. In 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, an ideologically incongruent coalition was able to maintain power due to perceptions of competence. By contrast, in 2024, as economic concerns took centre stage, ideological incongruence became a liability for coalition survival. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for our understanding of post-crisis Icelandic politics and their potential influence on future elections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13177/irpa.a.2025.21.1.1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
European Socioeconomic and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The 2024 Alþingi election: Is extreme electoral volatility the new norm?

Jón Gunnar Ólafsson, Agnar Freyr Helgason, Eva H. Önnudóttir, Ólafur Þ. Harðarson et al.
3 citations
Icelandic Review of Politics & Administration
European Socioeconomic and Political Studies
9.39
article

The 2024 Alþingi election: Is extreme electoral volatility the new norm?

Jón Gunnar Ólafsson, Agnar Freyr Helgason, Eva H. Önnudóttir, Ólafur Þ. Harðarson, Hafsteinn Einarsson, Hulda Þórisdóttir
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The 2024 Alþingi election resulted in substantial losses for the coalition government that had ruled Iceland since 2017. The three governing parties (the Left-Green Movement, Independence Party, and Progressive Party) secured a combined 29.5% of the vote, down from 54.3% three years earlier. We present an analysis of the 2024 election, informed by preliminary results from the Icelandic National Election Study. We examine the 2024 election through the theoretical lenses of economic voting and the cost of ruling, and place our findings in the context of post-crisis Icelandic electoral politics. Our analysis indicates that the 2024 election campaign was dominated by economic considerations, adversely affecting the governing parties. Economic concerns likely contributed to high levels of electoral volatility, as nearly half (49%) of all voters switched parties between 2021 and 2024. Governing parties lost badly and opposition parties (aside from parties furthest to the left) gained votes. The election results are also explored in terms of issue salience, post-crisis trends in political attitudes and behaviour, and voters’ media use. Our findings align with the established trend of a high cost of ruling in post-crisis Icelandic politics. In 2021, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, an ideologically incongruent coalition was able to maintain power due to perceptions of competence. By contrast, in 2024, as economic concerns took centre stage, ideological incongruence became a liability for coalition survival. We conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for our understanding of post-crisis Icelandic politics and their potential influence on future elections.

Icelandic Review of Politics & AdministrationVol. 21(1)
University of Iceland (IS)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Socioeconomic and Political Studies
9.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.