Informativeness of Critical Audit Matter (CAM) Disclosures: Investor Perceptions and Market Reactions

ABSTRACT This study analyzes how Critical Audit Matter (CAM) disclosures affect investor perceptions and market responses to discretionary reporting, by examining market reactions to the interaction between the textual characteristics of CAM disclosures and both discretionary (DLLP) and non‐discretionary (NDLLP) loan loss provisions in the banking sector. The results show that discretionary loan loss provisions are generally associated with a positive market reaction, as they may signal managerial confidence or financial strength. However, this reaction is reduced when CAM disclosures indicate audit complexity, contain a negative tone, or include uncertain language—leading to increased return volatility around the 10‐K filing date. These findings highlight the role CAM disclosures play in shaping how investors interpret managerial judgment in financial reporting. More broadly, the results carry regulatory implications by offering evidence on the informational value of CAM disclosures and their effectiveness in supporting investor decision‐making in complex reporting environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22810
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informativeness of Critical Audit Matter (CAM) Disclosures: Investor Perceptions and Market Reactions

Jongwon Ha
1 citations
Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

Informativeness of Critical Audit Matter (CAM) Disclosures: Investor Perceptions and Market Reactions

Jongwon Ha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study analyzes how Critical Audit Matter (CAM) disclosures affect investor perceptions and market responses to discretionary reporting, by examining market reactions to the interaction between the textual characteristics of CAM disclosures and both discretionary (DLLP) and non‐discretionary (NDLLP) loan loss provisions in the banking sector. The results show that discretionary loan loss provisions are generally associated with a positive market reaction, as they may signal managerial confidence or financial strength. However, this reaction is reduced when CAM disclosures indicate audit complexity, contain a negative tone, or include uncertain language—leading to increased return volatility around the 10‐K filing date. These findings highlight the role CAM disclosures play in shaping how investors interpret managerial judgment in financial reporting. More broadly, the results carry regulatory implications by offering evidence on the informational value of CAM disclosures and their effectiveness in supporting investor decision‐making in complex reporting environments.

Journal of Corporate Accounting & FinanceVol. 37(1)
Gonzaga University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.