Standardised Drone Procedures for Phytosociological Data Collection

ABSTRACT Aims Phytosociological maps are crucial for biodiversity conservation. Supervised mapping with machine learning demands high‐quality reference data that field surveys alone cannot provide. This study evaluates drone‐based procedures for phytosociological data collection, comparing them with field surveys. The research questions are as follows: Are species abundance data collected via drone surveys consistent with those obtained through traditional field phytosociological methods? Can plots be correctly assigned to known plant communities using drone data? Location Marche, Central Italy. Methods Drone surveys were conducted over forest and grassland plots using tailored imaging protocols. Forest plots were captured at 14 m with 11 high‐zoom images per plot, while grasslands were surveyed at 5 m with seven images per plot. The images were analysed to identify plant species and estimate their abundances, generating plot × species matrices. Multivariate analyses, including PCA, Mantel tests and supervised k‐means classification, were used to compare drone data with those obtained from the field traditional method. Results PCA and Mantel test results ( r = 0.782, p < 0.001) demonstrated a strong relationship between species abundance data collected by drone and traditional field methods in both forest and grassland. The supervised classification achieved an overall accuracy exceeding 90% in assigning drone‐surveyed plots to predefined plant associations. Conclusions This study introduces the proposal of standardised drone procedures to assist botanists in collecting phytosociological data in sub‐Mediterranean grasslands and forests. They can effectively complement and enhance the traditional Braun‐Blanquet method, broadening its scope and efficiently performing tasks such as vegetation unit assignment and creating reference data useful for the continuous production of supervised phytosociological maps of vegetation and habitats, which are essential for environmental monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Vegetation Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.70032
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.51
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardised Drone Procedures for Phytosociological Data Collection

Felipe Zamborlini Saiter, Nicole Hofmann, Simona Casavecchia, Giacomo Quattrini et al.
3 citations
Applied Vegetation Science
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
article

Standardised Drone Procedures for Phytosociological Data Collection

Felipe Zamborlini Saiter, Nicole Hofmann, Simona Casavecchia, Giacomo Quattrini, Simone Pesaresi, L. Lucchetti, Adriano Mancini
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aims Phytosociological maps are crucial for biodiversity conservation. Supervised mapping with machine learning demands high‐quality reference data that field surveys alone cannot provide. This study evaluates drone‐based procedures for phytosociological data collection, comparing them with field surveys. The research questions are as follows: Are species abundance data collected via drone surveys consistent with those obtained through traditional field phytosociological methods? Can plots be correctly assigned to known plant communities using drone data? Location Marche, Central Italy. Methods Drone surveys were conducted over forest and grassland plots using tailored imaging protocols. Forest plots were captured at 14 m with 11 high‐zoom images per plot, while grasslands were surveyed at 5 m with seven images per plot. The images were analysed to identify plant species and estimate their abundances, generating plot × species matrices. Multivariate analyses, including PCA, Mantel tests and supervised k‐means classification, were used to compare drone data with those obtained from the field traditional method. Results PCA and Mantel test results ( r = 0.782, p < 0.001) demonstrated a strong relationship between species abundance data collected by drone and traditional field methods in both forest and grassland. The supervised classification achieved an overall accuracy exceeding 90% in assigning drone‐surveyed plots to predefined plant associations. Conclusions This study introduces the proposal of standardised drone procedures to assist botanists in collecting phytosociological data in sub‐Mediterranean grasslands and forests. They can effectively complement and enhance the traditional Braun‐Blanquet method, broadening its scope and efficiently performing tasks such as vegetation unit assignment and creating reference data useful for the continuous production of supervised phytosociological maps of vegetation and habitats, which are essential for environmental monitoring.

Applied Vegetation ScienceVol. 28(2)
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
5.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.