„Die digitale Welt wird besser und schlechter zugleich“ – Künstliche Intelligenz im Spektrum von Erziehungswissenschaft und Rechtswissenschaft. Christian Leineweber im Gespräch mit Hannah Ruschemeier

Christian Leineweber and Hannah Ruschemeier discuss the legal implications of AI, particularly its impact on education, law, and accountability. Ruschemeier contends that AI should not be regarded as an independent actor but rather as a sociotechnical system that requires human oversight and responsibility. Legal challenges arise from algorithmic discrimination and AI-generated misinformation, highlighting the need for stronger regulatory frameworks like the AI Act and the Digital Services Act. Additionally, predictive analytics complicate established legal principles by enabling opaque, and deterministic decisions. While AI offers benefits, Ruschemeier cautions against its potential to reinforce structural inequalities, emphasizing that progress invariably carries both positive and negative consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erziehungswissenschaft
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3224/ezw.v36i1.09
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

„Die digitale Welt wird besser und schlechter zugleich“ – Künstliche Intelligenz im Spektrum von Erziehungswissenschaft und Rechtswissenschaft. Christian Leineweber im Gespräch mit Hannah Ruschemeier

Christian Leineweber, Hannah Ruschemeier
1 citations
Erziehungswissenschaft
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

„Die digitale Welt wird besser und schlechter zugleich“ – Künstliche Intelligenz im Spektrum von Erziehungswissenschaft und Rechtswissenschaft. Christian Leineweber im Gespräch mit Hannah Ruschemeier

Christian Leineweber, Hannah Ruschemeier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Christian Leineweber and Hannah Ruschemeier discuss the legal implications of AI, particularly its impact on education, law, and accountability. Ruschemeier contends that AI should not be regarded as an independent actor but rather as a sociotechnical system that requires human oversight and responsibility. Legal challenges arise from algorithmic discrimination and AI-generated misinformation, highlighting the need for stronger regulatory frameworks like the AI Act and the Digital Services Act. Additionally, predictive analytics complicate established legal principles by enabling opaque, and deterministic decisions. While AI offers benefits, Ruschemeier cautions against its potential to reinforce structural inequalities, emphasizing that progress invariably carries both positive and negative consequences.

ErziehungswissenschaftVol. 36(1-2025)
FernUniversität in Hagen (DE), Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg (DE)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.