Künstliche Intelligenz und Forschungsethik – eine pragmatische Sicht

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities for research, including the ability to process large datasets and generate hypotheses, but it also requires a critical evaluation of its reliability. Data protection laws, such as the GDPR and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, set clear guidelines, particularly for safeguarding personal data. AI can assist in various stages of the research process, from literature review to data analysis, yet its results must be rigorously assessed. Labeling AI-generated content is essential to ensure scientific transparency and clearly distinguish original intellectual contributions. Given the rapid pace of technological advancements, research institutions should provide ongoing training to address ethical and legal challenges appropriately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erziehungswissenschaft
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3224/ezw.v36i1.10
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Künstliche Intelligenz und Forschungsethik – eine pragmatische Sicht

Stefan Aufenanger
2 citations
Erziehungswissenschaft
Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
34.53
article

Künstliche Intelligenz und Forschungsethik – eine pragmatische Sicht

Stefan Aufenanger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities for research, including the ability to process large datasets and generate hypotheses, but it also requires a critical evaluation of its reliability. Data protection laws, such as the GDPR and the EU Artificial Intelligence Act, set clear guidelines, particularly for safeguarding personal data. AI can assist in various stages of the research process, from literature review to data analysis, yet its results must be rigorously assessed. Labeling AI-generated content is essential to ensure scientific transparency and clearly distinguish original intellectual contributions. Given the rapid pace of technological advancements, research institutions should provide ongoing training to address ethical and legal challenges appropriately.

ErziehungswissenschaftVol. 36(1-2025)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Technology, Environment, Urban Planning
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Künstliche Intelligenz und Forschungsethik – eine pragmatische Sicht — Stefan Aufenanger · Erziehungswissenschaft (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS