Battery electric vehicles show the lowest carbon footprints among passenger cars across 1.5–3.0 °C energy decarbonisation pathways
Passenger car carbon footprints are highly sensitive to future energy systems, a factor often overlooked in life cycle assessment. We use a time-dependent prospective life cycle assessment to enhance carbon footprints under four 1.5-3.0 °C decarbonisation pathways for electricity, fuel, and hydrogen from an energy-based integrated assessment model. Across 5000 comparative cases, battery electric vehicles consistently have the lowest carbon footprints compared to hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and fuel-cell vehicles. For example, battery electric vehicles show an average 32 to 47% lower footprint than hybrid combustion in 3.0 °C and 1.5 °C climate-compatible futures, respectively. This is driven by greater projected decarbonisation of electricity compared to fossil-dominated fuels and hydrogen. Battery electric vehicles meaningfully retain their advantage for mileages over 100,000 km, even in regions with carbon-intensive electricity since these are anticipated to decarbonise the most. Although our study supports battery electric vehicles as the most reliable climate-mitigation option for passenger cars, reducing their high manufacturing footprint remains important.
Authors
- Christopher Vagg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3424-8664)
- Romain Sacchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1440-0905)
- Joris Šimaitis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-919X)
- Isabela Butnar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9908-220X)
- Rick Lupton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-3085)
- Stephen Allen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-6466)
Institutions
- Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
- Designability (GB)
- Centre for Sustainable Energy (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Bath (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Earth & Environment
- Published
- 2025-06-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02447-2
- Citations
- 18
- Primary Topic
- Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 13.15
Funders
- UK Research and Innovation
- UK Energy Research Centre
- European Commission
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation