Online Fair Allocation of Reusable Resources

Motivated by the emerging paradigm of resource allocation that integrates classical objectives, such as cost minimization, with societal objectives, such as carbon awareness, this paper proposes a general framework for the online fair allocation of reusable resources. Within this framework, an online decision-maker seeks to allocate a finite resource with capacity C to a sequence of requests arriving with unknown distributions of types, utilities, and resource usage durations. To accommodate diverse objectives, the framework supports multiple actions and utility types, and the goal is to achieve max-min fairness among utilities, i.e., maximize the minimum time-averaged utility across all utility types. Our performance metric is an (α,β)-competitive guarantee of the form: ALG ≥ α • OPT * - O (T β-1 ), α, β ∈ (0, 1], where OPT * and ALG are the time-averaged optimum and objective value achieved by the decision maker, respectively. We propose a novel algorithm that achieves a competitive guarantee of (1- O (√(log C / C )),2/3) under the bandit feedback. As resource capacity increases, the multiplicative competitive ratio term 1-O(√(log C / C )) asymptotically approaches optimality. Notably, when the resource capacity exceeds a certain threshold, our algorithm achieves an improved competitive guarantee of (1, 2/3). Our algorithm employs an optimistic penalty-weight mechanism coupled with a dual exploration-discarding strategy to balance resource feasibility, exploration, and fairness among utilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3744970.3727300
Primary Topic
Optimization and Search Problems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Online Fair Allocation of Reusable Resources

Mohammad Hajiesmaili, Qingsong Liu
ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
Optimization and Search Problems
article

Online Fair Allocation of Reusable Resources

Mohammad Hajiesmaili, Qingsong Liu
article en

Abstract

Motivated by the emerging paradigm of resource allocation that integrates classical objectives, such as cost minimization, with societal objectives, such as carbon awareness, this paper proposes a general framework for the online fair allocation of reusable resources. Within this framework, an online decision-maker seeks to allocate a finite resource with capacity C to a sequence of requests arriving with unknown distributions of types, utilities, and resource usage durations. To accommodate diverse objectives, the framework supports multiple actions and utility types, and the goal is to achieve max-min fairness among utilities, i.e., maximize the minimum time-averaged utility across all utility types. Our performance metric is an (α,β)-competitive guarantee of the form: ALG ≥ α • OPT * - O (T β-1 ), α, β ∈ (0, 1], where OPT * and ALG are the time-averaged optimum and objective value achieved by the decision maker, respectively. We propose a novel algorithm that achieves a competitive guarantee of (1- O (√(log C / C )),2/3) under the bandit feedback. As resource capacity increases, the multiplicative competitive ratio term 1-O(√(log C / C )) asymptotically approaches optimality. Notably, when the resource capacity exceeds a certain threshold, our algorithm achieves an improved competitive guarantee of (1, 2/3). Our algorithm employs an optimistic penalty-weight mechanism coupled with a dual exploration-discarding strategy to balance resource feasibility, exploration, and fairness among utilities.

ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation ReviewVol. 53(1)
Amherst College (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Optimization and Search Problems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.