The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court Over the Killing of the Reporter of Al-Jazeera Shereen Abu Aqleh

This research dealt with the issue of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the murder of the journalist Shireen Abu Aqleh in Jenin on Wednesday morning, May 11, 2022. In this regard, the research addressed the various and possible scenarios in the issue of criminal jurisdiction in both its formal and objective aspects in terms of overlap, parallelism and separation between national and international criminal jurisdiction as well as the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction on the case in question. All of this was derived from the research problem represented by the conflict of criminal jurisdiction in the case under investigation, especially in complex cases - including the case handled in this research - when the crime is committed on the territory of a state party and the accused holds the nationality of a non-party state and the victim is a third-country national, and also when another complexity is added when the crime scene is classified as an occupied territory. The research also addressed the substantive jurisdiction of the court in support of the applicability of the elements of a war crime given that the victim is a civilian, and the Israeli occupation has always violated many of the principles of the Rome Statute, the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their 1977 protocols, particularly, the principle of distinction and the principle of proportionality. This is assuming the presence of a military target, which the research found to deny. The research aimed to put those scenarios before the jurists and practitioners in the domain of international criminal law for a more in depth understanding about the jurisdiction scenarios. The research concluded that there was a defect in the principle of “complementarity” in criminal jurisdiction, which the International Criminal Court adopts which, according to the researcher, impedes achieving justice in a speedy manner in such cases.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35517/aaup-2025.v11.1.04
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court Over the Killing of the Reporter of Al-Jazeera Shereen Abu Aqleh

Ibrahim Khalid Abd Yahya, Rezeq Ahmad Salmoodi, Mahmoud Al-Qarem
1 links
International Law and Human Rights
article

The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court Over the Killing of the Reporter of Al-Jazeera Shereen Abu Aqleh

Ibrahim Khalid Abd Yahya, Rezeq Ahmad Salmoodi, Mahmoud Al-Qarem
article en

Abstract

This research dealt with the issue of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over the murder of the journalist Shireen Abu Aqleh in Jenin on Wednesday morning, May 11, 2022. In this regard, the research addressed the various and possible scenarios in the issue of criminal jurisdiction in both its formal and objective aspects in terms of overlap, parallelism and separation between national and international criminal jurisdiction as well as the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction on the case in question. All of this was derived from the research problem represented by the conflict of criminal jurisdiction in the case under investigation, especially in complex cases - including the case handled in this research - when the crime is committed on the territory of a state party and the accused holds the nationality of a non-party state and the victim is a third-country national, and also when another complexity is added when the crime scene is classified as an occupied territory. The research also addressed the substantive jurisdiction of the court in support of the applicability of the elements of a war crime given that the victim is a civilian, and the Israeli occupation has always violated many of the principles of the Rome Statute, the 1949 Geneva Conventions and their 1977 protocols, particularly, the principle of distinction and the principle of proportionality. This is assuming the presence of a military target, which the research found to deny. The research aimed to put those scenarios before the jurists and practitioners in the domain of international criminal law for a more in depth understanding about the jurisdiction scenarios. The research concluded that there was a defect in the principle of “complementarity” in criminal jurisdiction, which the International Criminal Court adopts which, according to the researcher, impedes achieving justice in a speedy manner in such cases.

Vol. 11(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.