When Collaboration Falters, Insensitivity to How Our Actions Affect Others Drives Inflated Self-evaluations

Abstract During high-stake interactions, people not only evaluate policies or outcomes, but also themselves and others. Such evaluations may be crucial for long-term outcomes, such as harmonious marriage, confident leadership and indeed mental health. Powerful evaluations occur during interactions, where people can support or let each other down. Thus, we implemented an interactive decision-making game, wherein two real-life participants explicitly evaluated themselves and their play-partner while playing an ecologically framed, probabilistic, iterated prisoner’s dilemma. To separate preferences from abilities, participants did not interact with the other directly, but instructed a computer avatar on how to play on their behalf. We tested a range of computational models of participants’ person-evaluations. In some, self-evaluation relied on regret or satisfaction regarding one’s decisions. However, the winning models relied directly on observed gains and losses. Here, evaluation of the self was proportional to how much one’s partner benefited, and vice versa. We found a marked self-positivity bias, which was most prominent in dyads where both partners often defected. Between participants, a self-positivity bias was explained by a reduced weight of one’s partner’s benefits onto self-evaluation. This suggests that the negative outcomes claimed to attract defensive, external attribution by attribution theorists are one’s partner’s poor outcomes. Further analysis suggested that a reduced sensitivity to others’ outcomes was associated with reduced earnings for the self, hinting at a functional role for person-evaluations in decision-making. Thus, we introduce a novel computational model that provides a concise account of self-serving bias in evaluations, as observed during risky dyadic interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Brain & Behavior
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-025-00250-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Collaboration Falters, Insensitivity to How Our Actions Affect Others Drives Inflated Self-evaluations

Anne‐Laura van Harmelen, Emma Davies, Sharon Neufeld, Becky Inkster et al.
1 citations
Computational Brain & Behavior
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
article

When Collaboration Falters, Insensitivity to How Our Actions Affect Others Drives Inflated Self-evaluations

Anne‐Laura van Harmelen, Emma Davies, Sharon Neufeld, Becky Inkster, Ian Goodyer, Sian Granville, Petra E. Vértes, Peter Fonagy, Rafael Romero-García, Ayesha Alrumaithi, John Suckling, Raymond J. Dolan, Sara Pantaleone, Daniel Isaacs, Aislinn Bowler, Cinly Ooi, Harriet L. Mills, Danae Kokorikou, Pasco Fearon, Gita Prabhu, Alexandra Hopkins, Edward Thomas Bullmore, Geert‐Jan Will, Tobias U. Hauser, Jenny Scott, Giles W. Story, Christina Maurice, Ashlyn Firkins, Kalia Cleridou, Hina Dadabhoy, Sarah Birt, Rogier Kievit, Kirstie Whitaker, Elizabeth Harding, Ciara O’Donnell, Laura Villis, Jessica Memarzia, Cleo McIntosh, Peter Brian Jones, Janchai King, Umar Toseeb, Michelle St Clair, Barry Widmer, Michael Moutoussis, Junaid Bhatti, Meera Gosalia, Siobhan Edinboro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract During high-stake interactions, people not only evaluate policies or outcomes, but also themselves and others. Such evaluations may be crucial for long-term outcomes, such as harmonious marriage, confident leadership and indeed mental health. Powerful evaluations occur during interactions, where people can support or let each other down. Thus, we implemented an interactive decision-making game, wherein two real-life participants explicitly evaluated themselves and their play-partner while playing an ecologically framed, probabilistic, iterated prisoner’s dilemma. To separate preferences from abilities, participants did not interact with the other directly, but instructed a computer avatar on how to play on their behalf. We tested a range of computational models of participants’ person-evaluations. In some, self-evaluation relied on regret or satisfaction regarding one’s decisions. However, the winning models relied directly on observed gains and losses. Here, evaluation of the self was proportional to how much one’s partner benefited, and vice versa. We found a marked self-positivity bias, which was most prominent in dyads where both partners often defected. Between participants, a self-positivity bias was explained by a reduced weight of one’s partner’s benefits onto self-evaluation. This suggests that the negative outcomes claimed to attract defensive, external attribution by attribution theorists are one’s partner’s poor outcomes. Further analysis suggested that a reduced sensitivity to others’ outcomes was associated with reduced earnings for the self, hinting at a functional role for person-evaluations in decision-making. Thus, we introduce a novel computational model that provides a concise account of self-serving bias in evaluations, as observed during risky dyadic interactions.

Computational Brain & Behavior
King's College London (GB), Utrecht University (NL), Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing (DE), University College London (GB), University of Tübingen (DE)
Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, Wellcome Trust, Leverhulme Trust, Jacobs Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
2.37
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.