A Hypothetical Machiavellian-Type Evaluation System in Education: Contrasting and Reversing the Key Principles of Total Quality Management

In the contemporary era, it is widely recognized that, for organizations and businesses to ensure their survival, it is imperative to offer high-quality services that are consistently aligned with customer satisfaction.Any organization or enterprise that fails to adapt to the continuously evolving needs of its clientele, or that is unable to meet their expectations through the provision of quality services, is likely to be surpassed and displaced by its competitors.Consequently, organizations increasingly strive to organize their management structures in a manner that adheres to the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM).Within the scope of the present study, the work of Niccol Machiavelli is also examined through the perspective of management theory.Machiavelli's writings have been the subject of extensive scholarly investigation, as they are often regarded as a foundational manual for modern management practices.The primary aim of this study is the development of a hypothetical counterexample: a Machiavellian-type evaluation system applied within an educational institution, constructed by contrasting and inverting the fundamental principles of the Total Quality framework to the greatest extent possible.Accordingly, it is deemed necessary to deconstruct the overarching purpose into its constituent elements and analyze each independently.More specifically, the objectives of this research are: to define the concepts of Machiavellianism and Total Quality Management; to document their principal characteristics; to propose a structure for a

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.1206002
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Hypothetical Machiavellian-Type Evaluation System in Education: Contrasting and Reversing the Key Principles of Total Quality Management

Keramida Konstantia
International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

A Hypothetical Machiavellian-Type Evaluation System in Education: Contrasting and Reversing the Key Principles of Total Quality Management

Keramida Konstantia
article en

Abstract

In the contemporary era, it is widely recognized that, for organizations and businesses to ensure their survival, it is imperative to offer high-quality services that are consistently aligned with customer satisfaction.Any organization or enterprise that fails to adapt to the continuously evolving needs of its clientele, or that is unable to meet their expectations through the provision of quality services, is likely to be surpassed and displaced by its competitors.Consequently, organizations increasingly strive to organize their management structures in a manner that adheres to the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM).Within the scope of the present study, the work of Niccol Machiavelli is also examined through the perspective of management theory.Machiavelli's writings have been the subject of extensive scholarly investigation, as they are often regarded as a foundational manual for modern management practices.The primary aim of this study is the development of a hypothetical counterexample: a Machiavellian-type evaluation system applied within an educational institution, constructed by contrasting and inverting the fundamental principles of the Total Quality framework to the greatest extent possible.Accordingly, it is deemed necessary to deconstruct the overarching purpose into its constituent elements and analyze each independently.More specifically, the objectives of this research are: to define the concepts of Machiavellianism and Total Quality Management; to document their principal characteristics; to propose a structure for a

International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and EducationVol. 12(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Hypothetical Machiavellian-Type Evaluation System in Education: Contrasting and Reversing the Key Principles of Total Quality Management — Keramida Konstantia · International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS