A Survey on Confidence Calibration of Deep Learning-Based Classification Models Under Class Imbalance Data

Confidence calibration in classification models is a vital technique for accurately estimating the posterior probabilities of predicted results, which is crucial for assessing the likelihood of correct decisions in real-world applications. Class imbalance data, which biases the model's learning and subsequently skews predicted posterior probabilities, makes confidence calibration more challenging. Especially for underrepresented classes, which are often more important and tend to have higher uncertainty, confidence calibration is more complex and essential. Unlike previous surveys that typically separately investigate confidence calibration or class imbalance, this article comprehensively investigates confidence calibration methods for deep learning-based classification models under class imbalance. First, the problem of confidence calibration under class imbalance data is outlined. Second, this article explores the impact of class imbalance data on confidence calibration in theory, providing some explanations for empirical findings in existing studies. Third, this article reviews 60 state-of-the-art confidence calibration methods under class imbalance data, divides these methods into six groups according to method differences, and systematically compares seven properties to evaluate their superiority. Then, some commonly used and emerging evaluation methodology are summarized, including public datasets and evaluation metrics. Subsequently, this article performs necessary comparative experiments to provide better guidelines and insights to the readership. Finally, we discuss several application fields and promising research directions that serve as a guideline for future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2025.3565159
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey on Confidence Calibration of Deep Learning-Based Classification Models Under Class Imbalance Data

Jinzong Dong, Zhaohui Jiang, Dong Pan, Gui Gui et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
4.96
article

A Survey on Confidence Calibration of Deep Learning-Based Classification Models Under Class Imbalance Data

Jinzong Dong, Zhaohui Jiang, Dong Pan, Gui Gui, Hong‐Bin Zhang, Weihua Gui, Zhiwen Chen, Qingyi Guan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Confidence calibration in classification models is a vital technique for accurately estimating the posterior probabilities of predicted results, which is crucial for assessing the likelihood of correct decisions in real-world applications. Class imbalance data, which biases the model's learning and subsequently skews predicted posterior probabilities, makes confidence calibration more challenging. Especially for underrepresented classes, which are often more important and tend to have higher uncertainty, confidence calibration is more complex and essential. Unlike previous surveys that typically separately investigate confidence calibration or class imbalance, this article comprehensively investigates confidence calibration methods for deep learning-based classification models under class imbalance. First, the problem of confidence calibration under class imbalance data is outlined. Second, this article explores the impact of class imbalance data on confidence calibration in theory, providing some explanations for empirical findings in existing studies. Third, this article reviews 60 state-of-the-art confidence calibration methods under class imbalance data, divides these methods into six groups according to method differences, and systematically compares seven properties to evaluate their superiority. Then, some commonly used and emerging evaluation methodology are summarized, including public datasets and evaluation metrics. Subsequently, this article performs necessary comparative experiments to provide better guidelines and insights to the readership. Finally, we discuss several application fields and promising research directions that serve as a guideline for future studies.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning SystemsVol. 36(9)
Central South University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of Shanxi Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.