Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transport via repurposed natural gas pipelines: Flow dynamics and infrastructure tradeoffs

Hydrogen's potential as an energy-efficient fuel is well recognized; however, its transport through existing natural gas pipelines poses significant technical and economic challenges. This study evaluates the feasibility of hydrogen transport through existing natural gas pipelines by analyzing pipeline flow dynamics, pressure drop, energy balance, and cost implications. Results show that hydrogen's lower density and higher velocity cause pressure losses up to 3.5 times greater than methane, requiring increased inlet pressures and additional compression to maintain comparable volumetric energy output (∼35.8 MJ/m 3 for methane). Pressure drops along a 300-mile pipeline can exceed 120 psi for hydrogen at high flow rates, compared to 40 psi for methane, highlighting the need for infrastructure upgrades. A comparative analysis of three scenarios—repurposing existing pipelines, achieving methane-equivalent energy output through compression, and constructing new hydrogen-specific pipelines—reveals that matching methane's volumetric energy delivery increases operational costs by ∼35 % due to higher compression demands. While repurposing offers short-term cost benefits, it necessitates extensive modifications to address hydrogen embrittlement and efficiency losses. Conversely, dedicated hydrogen pipelines, despite higher capital investment, provide a more cost-effective long-term solution. These findings underscore the importance of optimized compression strategies, hydrogen-compatible materials, and supportive policies to develop scalable, safe, and economically viable hydrogen infrastructure. • Analyzes hydrogen flow and pressure drop in repurposed methane pipelines. • Quantifies pressure needs for hydrogen to match methane energy delivery. • Compares retrofit, energy-parity upgrade, and new pipeline scenarios. • Finds retrofitting cuts CAPEX by up to 75 % but needs key safety upgrades. • New pipelines cost more but offer safer, long-term hydrogen transport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.150033
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transport via repurposed natural gas pipelines: Flow dynamics and infrastructure tradeoffs

Mohamed Z. Mehana, Bailian Chen, Prashant Sharan, Zhiwei Ma et al.
14 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
5.09
article

Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen transport via repurposed natural gas pipelines: Flow dynamics and infrastructure tradeoffs

Mohamed Z. Mehana, Bailian Chen, Prashant Sharan, Zhiwei Ma, Min Wang, Jai Krishna Sahith Sayani
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Hydrogen's potential as an energy-efficient fuel is well recognized; however, its transport through existing natural gas pipelines poses significant technical and economic challenges. This study evaluates the feasibility of hydrogen transport through existing natural gas pipelines by analyzing pipeline flow dynamics, pressure drop, energy balance, and cost implications. Results show that hydrogen's lower density and higher velocity cause pressure losses up to 3.5 times greater than methane, requiring increased inlet pressures and additional compression to maintain comparable volumetric energy output (∼35.8 MJ/m 3 for methane). Pressure drops along a 300-mile pipeline can exceed 120 psi for hydrogen at high flow rates, compared to 40 psi for methane, highlighting the need for infrastructure upgrades. A comparative analysis of three scenarios—repurposing existing pipelines, achieving methane-equivalent energy output through compression, and constructing new hydrogen-specific pipelines—reveals that matching methane's volumetric energy delivery increases operational costs by ∼35 % due to higher compression demands. While repurposing offers short-term cost benefits, it necessitates extensive modifications to address hydrogen embrittlement and efficiency losses. Conversely, dedicated hydrogen pipelines, despite higher capital investment, provide a more cost-effective long-term solution. These findings underscore the importance of optimized compression strategies, hydrogen-compatible materials, and supportive policies to develop scalable, safe, and economically viable hydrogen infrastructure. • Analyzes hydrogen flow and pressure drop in repurposed methane pipelines. • Quantifies pressure needs for hydrogen to match methane energy delivery. • Compares retrofit, energy-parity upgrade, and new pipeline scenarios. • Finds retrofitting cuts CAPEX by up to 75 % but needs key safety upgrades. • New pipelines cost more but offer safer, long-term hydrogen transport.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 147
Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration, Laboratory Directed Research and Development, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.