Occupational disorders: Interactions between gender and migrant status among individuals engaged in paid work in Sweden

Ensuring decent and safe working conditions, minimizing the risks of serious occupational injuries, and upholding nondiscriminatory rights to compensation for such disorders are central policy objectives for sustainable development. Workers that nevertheless suffer from occupational disorders should be entitled to compensation. This article examines if this de jure entitlement is enforced in a non-discriminatory way by comparing how workers’ gender and migrant status is correlated with their probability of receiving compensation. The aim is to compare the approval rate of compensation for serious occupational disorders, considering workers’ gender and migration status (country of birth), while controlling for the type of diagnosis (and consequently, the type of injury). We analyzed all applications for compensation related to serious occupational disorders from 2010 to 2018, by applying Bayesian logistic regression on a data set of 20088 applicants and a total of 414 combinations of sex (2), region of birth (3), and diagnoses (69) (2 × 3 × 69 = 414). The probability of receiving compensation was significantly influenced by both gender and region of birth, even after accounting for the type of diagnosis. In general, men had a higher chance of receiving compensation than women from the same region. Additionally, individuals from Nordic countries had a greater likelihood of compensation compared to those from the EU, who, in turn, had a higher chance than individuals from the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region. However, women from the EU did not fare better than women from the MENA region in terms of compensation. Occupational disorders result in significant suffering and loss at individual, community, societal, and organizational levels, making them a global sustainability challenge. To address the issue of inequitable access to compensation, the Swedish compensation authority should thoroughly investigate the systematic advantage enjoyed by Nordic men.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101593
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational disorders: Interactions between gender and migrant status among individuals engaged in paid work in Sweden

Lotta Dellve, Hans Ekbrand
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Occupational disorders: Interactions between gender and migrant status among individuals engaged in paid work in Sweden

Lotta Dellve, Hans Ekbrand
article en

Abstract

Ensuring decent and safe working conditions, minimizing the risks of serious occupational injuries, and upholding nondiscriminatory rights to compensation for such disorders are central policy objectives for sustainable development. Workers that nevertheless suffer from occupational disorders should be entitled to compensation. This article examines if this de jure entitlement is enforced in a non-discriminatory way by comparing how workers’ gender and migrant status is correlated with their probability of receiving compensation. The aim is to compare the approval rate of compensation for serious occupational disorders, considering workers’ gender and migration status (country of birth), while controlling for the type of diagnosis (and consequently, the type of injury). We analyzed all applications for compensation related to serious occupational disorders from 2010 to 2018, by applying Bayesian logistic regression on a data set of 20088 applicants and a total of 414 combinations of sex (2), region of birth (3), and diagnoses (69) (2 × 3 × 69 = 414). The probability of receiving compensation was significantly influenced by both gender and region of birth, even after accounting for the type of diagnosis. In general, men had a higher chance of receiving compensation than women from the same region. Additionally, individuals from Nordic countries had a greater likelihood of compensation compared to those from the EU, who, in turn, had a higher chance than individuals from the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region. However, women from the EU did not fare better than women from the MENA region in terms of compensation. Occupational disorders result in significant suffering and loss at individual, community, societal, and organizational levels, making them a global sustainability challenge. To address the issue of inequitable access to compensation, the Swedish compensation authority should thoroughly investigate the systematic advantage enjoyed by Nordic men.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 12
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap, Vetenskapsrådet, Göteborgs Universitet, Sahlgrenska Akademin
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.