Effect of microstrain on the crystallite size of ZnO nanoparticles: X-ray peak profile and Rietveld analysis

Crystallite size is an important parameter that can be easily calculated from the X-ray diffraction pattern. However, the diffraction peaks may shift and broaden due to change in particle size caused by dislocations and strain in the crystal. We have used the Rietveld analysis to evaluate the lattice parameters of the wurtzite ZnO nanoparticles. Crystallite size was initially calculated from Scherrer formula. In Scherrer method the broadening was not included, but W-H method, UDM, USDM, UDEDM consider the peak broadening due to lattice strain and anisotropy. The crystallite size calculation by the later three methods give almost same result (41.58 nm, 41.48 nm and 42.48 nm). The crystallite size calculated using the SSP method was 41.2 nm which is very close to the other three methods. Our findings suggest that microstrain can impact on the calculated crystallite size using various methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Next Materials
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100841
Citations
10
Primary Topic
ZnO doping and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of microstrain on the crystallite size of ZnO nanoparticles: X-ray peak profile and Rietveld analysis

Pijus Kanti Samanta
10 citations
Next Materials
ZnO doping and properties
5.18
article

Effect of microstrain on the crystallite size of ZnO nanoparticles: X-ray peak profile and Rietveld analysis

Pijus Kanti Samanta
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Crystallite size is an important parameter that can be easily calculated from the X-ray diffraction pattern. However, the diffraction peaks may shift and broaden due to change in particle size caused by dislocations and strain in the crystal. We have used the Rietveld analysis to evaluate the lattice parameters of the wurtzite ZnO nanoparticles. Crystallite size was initially calculated from Scherrer formula. In Scherrer method the broadening was not included, but W-H method, UDM, USDM, UDEDM consider the peak broadening due to lattice strain and anisotropy. The crystallite size calculation by the later three methods give almost same result (41.58 nm, 41.48 nm and 42.48 nm). The crystallite size calculated using the SSP method was 41.2 nm which is very close to the other three methods. Our findings suggest that microstrain can impact on the calculated crystallite size using various methods.

Next MaterialsVol. 8
Vidyasagar University (IN), Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, West Bengal (IN)
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
ZnO doping and properties
5.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.