A nomenclator botanicus for the bryophyllous and related species published in, or transferred to, Bryophyllum, now included in Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae)

From 1805, the year in which the genus name Bryophyllum was published, until 1907 / 1908 when Raymond-Hamet published the first modern monograph of Kalanchoe, Bryophyllum was sometimes accepted at the rank of genus or as a synonym of Kalanchoe. Although Augustin Pyramus de Candolle had suggested as early as in 1828 that Bryophyllum should be included in Kalanchoe, this was only done formally in Raymond-Hamet’s two-part monograph more than 70 years later. However, in 1930 Alwin Berger, when treating the Crassulaceae for the second edition of Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, reinstated Bryophyllum, as well as Kitchingia, for that matter, as accepted genera. The kalanchooid taxonomy presented by Berger proved to be influential and was adopted in, for example, several regional Floras, such as those produced for Angola (Conspectus florae angolensis), the Flora zambesiaca region, the Flora of Southern Africa region, and the Flora of China (but not in the Flora of Ceylon [Sri Lanka]). The global synoptic treatment of Kalanchoe by Bernard M. Descoings published in 2003 again reverted to treating Bryophyllum at an infrageneric rank in Kalanchoe, as K. sect. Bryophyllum, so following Pierre L. Boiteau who published the latter combination in 1947, after Sijfert H. Koorders had already recognised K. subg. Bryophyllum, i.e., at the rank of subgenus, in 1919. Most recently, combinations were published in Bryophyllum in 2008, when several kalanchoes described, especially, from the late-1990s onwards, were transferred to Bryophyllum. However, Bryophyllum is at present recognised at the rank of subgenus in Kalanchoe, as K. subg. Bryophyllum, as published by Koorders. A nomenclator botanicus for Bryophyllum is presented here, along with the equivalent names under which they are at present accepted in Kalanchoe. This paper forms part of ongoing work on the taxonomy and nomenclature of Kalanchoe globally. A selection of bryophyllous kalanchoes is illustrated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phytotaxa
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.706.1.1
Primary Topic
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A nomenclator botanicus for the bryophyllous and related species published in, or transferred to, Bryophyllum, now included in Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae)

Gideon F. Smith
1 links
Phytotaxa
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
article

A nomenclator botanicus for the bryophyllous and related species published in, or transferred to, Bryophyllum, now included in Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae)

Gideon F. Smith
article en

Abstract

From 1805, the year in which the genus name Bryophyllum was published, until 1907 / 1908 when Raymond-Hamet published the first modern monograph of Kalanchoe, Bryophyllum was sometimes accepted at the rank of genus or as a synonym of Kalanchoe. Although Augustin Pyramus de Candolle had suggested as early as in 1828 that Bryophyllum should be included in Kalanchoe, this was only done formally in Raymond-Hamet’s two-part monograph more than 70 years later. However, in 1930 Alwin Berger, when treating the Crassulaceae for the second edition of Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, reinstated Bryophyllum, as well as Kitchingia, for that matter, as accepted genera. The kalanchooid taxonomy presented by Berger proved to be influential and was adopted in, for example, several regional Floras, such as those produced for Angola (Conspectus florae angolensis), the Flora zambesiaca region, the Flora of Southern Africa region, and the Flora of China (but not in the Flora of Ceylon [Sri Lanka]). The global synoptic treatment of Kalanchoe by Bernard M. Descoings published in 2003 again reverted to treating Bryophyllum at an infrageneric rank in Kalanchoe, as K. sect. Bryophyllum, so following Pierre L. Boiteau who published the latter combination in 1947, after Sijfert H. Koorders had already recognised K. subg. Bryophyllum, i.e., at the rank of subgenus, in 1919. Most recently, combinations were published in Bryophyllum in 2008, when several kalanchoes described, especially, from the late-1990s onwards, were transferred to Bryophyllum. However, Bryophyllum is at present recognised at the rank of subgenus in Kalanchoe, as K. subg. Bryophyllum, as published by Koorders. A nomenclator botanicus for Bryophyllum is presented here, along with the equivalent names under which they are at present accepted in Kalanchoe. This paper forms part of ongoing work on the taxonomy and nomenclature of Kalanchoe globally. A selection of bryophyllous kalanchoes is illustrated.

PhytotaxaVol. 706(1)
Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A nomenclator botanicus for the bryophyllous and related species published in, or transferred to, Bryophyllum, now included in Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Cotyledonoideae) — Gideon F. Smith · Phytotaxa (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS