Simulation-Based Analysis of DRL Exploitation Rate for Voltage and Frequency Stability in a Single-Inverter Microgrid Control System

This paper discusses the development and performance evaluation of a single-inverter-based microgrid control system using a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agent trained with the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm. The controller is specifically designed to address unplanned transitions during fluctuating load conditions and transitions between grid-tied and islanded modes. An analysis of Final Exploitation Rates (FER) ranging from 5% to 1% was conducted to assess transient responses and steady-state performance. A comparison with a traditional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller reveals that while the DRL agent with 2%-FER demonstrates strong performance in managing transient events, the PID controller provides superior stability in steady-state operation. Key performance indicators, including Rise Time, Settling Time, Settling Min/Max, Peak Time, and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), were examined. The results show that the DRL agent with 2%-FER effectively limits frequency deviations to ±1% and voltage deviations to within ±2.5% during transitions, whereas agents with FER 3−5% displayed instability with deviations of up to 2% for frequency and 4% for voltage. The PID controller, however, maintained more consistent steady-state performance, with frequency tightly distributed around 49.95−50.05 Hz and voltage near 1 pu. These findings suggest that DRL-based control is better suited for handling unplanned transitions, where proactive adjustment is crucial, while PID control is more effective for steady-state conditions where a passive control approach accommodates system dynamics more naturally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3580992
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microgrid Control and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simulation-Based Analysis of DRL Exploitation Rate for Voltage and Frequency Stability in a Single-Inverter Microgrid Control System

Prisma Megantoro, Noer Fadzri Perdana Dinata, Muhammad Abu Bakar Sidik, Makbul A.M. Ramli et al.
1 citations
IEEE Access
Microgrid Control and Optimization
1.21
article

Simulation-Based Analysis of DRL Exploitation Rate for Voltage and Frequency Stability in a Single-Inverter Microgrid Control System

Prisma Megantoro, Noer Fadzri Perdana Dinata, Muhammad Abu Bakar Sidik, Makbul A.M. Ramli, Muhammad Irfan Jambak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper discusses the development and performance evaluation of a single-inverter-based microgrid control system using a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) agent trained with the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm. The controller is specifically designed to address unplanned transitions during fluctuating load conditions and transitions between grid-tied and islanded modes. An analysis of Final Exploitation Rates (FER) ranging from 5% to 1% was conducted to assess transient responses and steady-state performance. A comparison with a traditional Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) controller reveals that while the DRL agent with 2%-FER demonstrates strong performance in managing transient events, the PID controller provides superior stability in steady-state operation. Key performance indicators, including Rise Time, Settling Time, Settling Min/Max, Peak Time, and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), were examined. The results show that the DRL agent with 2%-FER effectively limits frequency deviations to ±1% and voltage deviations to within ±2.5% during transitions, whereas agents with FER 3−5% displayed instability with deviations of up to 2% for frequency and 4% for voltage. The PID controller, however, maintained more consistent steady-state performance, with frequency tightly distributed around 49.95−50.05 Hz and voltage near 1 pu. These findings suggest that DRL-based control is better suited for handling unplanned transitions, where proactive adjustment is crucial, while PID control is more effective for steady-state conditions where a passive control approach accommodates system dynamics more naturally.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Universitas Airlangga (ID), Sriwijaya University (ID)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Microgrid Control and Optimization
1.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.