Optimizing the lead time of operational flexibility trading from distributed industrial energy systems in future energy and flexibility markets

To address the challenges posed by increasing shares of variable renewable power generation in the electric grid, flexibility procurement platforms are being actively developed. These platforms enable prosumers to offer flexible power for use in mitigating predicted grid congestion. However, the optimal design of such flexibility markets remains unclear and requires thorough analysis. A critical parameter is the lead time between the acceptance of offered flexible power and its delivery, directly influencing flexibility availability and cost. Despite its importance, the impact of lead time on flexibility provision cost has not been evaluated in the literature. In this study, we analyze this cost effect of varying lead times on flexibility provision by simulating a 48-hour moving horizon model predictive control for multiple distributed energy systems on a market platform, delivering flexibility under different lead time scenarios. Additionally, the deliveries are analyzed under varying demand durations, electricity tariffs, daytimes, and seasons to evaluate their response to diverse influencing factors. The findings are presented using a newly developed flexibility heatmap, illustrating lead time dependent flexibility deliveries and their associated costs. The results indicate that with a lead time of 3 h, the cost of providing flexibility using current combined heat and power systems is minimized, achieving cost reductions of up to 77%. Transitioning to advanced heat pumps and battery storage technologies increases the available flexibility ninefold. However, such systems require a lead time of 16 h to deliver flexibility at minimized costs, highlighting the growing importance of lead time in flexibility provision. • Investigation of 3 types of common energy system designs based on a real company. • 48-h moving horizon model predictive control simulation. • Comprehensive analysis of different energy flexibility signal lead times. • New flexibility heatmap to visualize signal lead time dependent costs. • Increase in optimal signal lead time due to future energy system designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110782
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the lead time of operational flexibility trading from distributed industrial energy systems in future energy and flexibility markets

Marco Braun, Adrian Bürger, Anke Weidlich, Daniel Bull et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.19
article

Optimizing the lead time of operational flexibility trading from distributed industrial energy systems in future energy and flexibility markets

Marco Braun, Adrian Bürger, Anke Weidlich, Daniel Bull, Markus Bohlayer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

To address the challenges posed by increasing shares of variable renewable power generation in the electric grid, flexibility procurement platforms are being actively developed. These platforms enable prosumers to offer flexible power for use in mitigating predicted grid congestion. However, the optimal design of such flexibility markets remains unclear and requires thorough analysis. A critical parameter is the lead time between the acceptance of offered flexible power and its delivery, directly influencing flexibility availability and cost. Despite its importance, the impact of lead time on flexibility provision cost has not been evaluated in the literature. In this study, we analyze this cost effect of varying lead times on flexibility provision by simulating a 48-hour moving horizon model predictive control for multiple distributed energy systems on a market platform, delivering flexibility under different lead time scenarios. Additionally, the deliveries are analyzed under varying demand durations, electricity tariffs, daytimes, and seasons to evaluate their response to diverse influencing factors. The findings are presented using a newly developed flexibility heatmap, illustrating lead time dependent flexibility deliveries and their associated costs. The results indicate that with a lead time of 3 h, the cost of providing flexibility using current combined heat and power systems is minimized, achieving cost reductions of up to 77%. Transitioning to advanced heat pumps and battery storage technologies increases the available flexibility ninefold. However, such systems require a lead time of 16 h to deliver flexibility at minimized costs, highlighting the growing importance of lead time in flexibility provision. • Investigation of 3 types of common energy system designs based on a real company. • 48-h moving horizon model predictive control simulation. • Comprehensive analysis of different energy flexibility signal lead times. • New flexibility heatmap to visualize signal lead time dependent costs. • Increase in optimal signal lead time due to future energy system designs.

International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy SystemsVol. 170
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), FZI Research Center for Information Technology (DE), University of Freiburg (DE)
Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.