Electrochemical diffusion signatures of solid-solution and phase-separating active materials in Li-ion batteries

Abstract The working principle of lithium-ion batteries lies in the intercalation of lithium ions in electrode active materials, which exhibit either solid-solution or phase-separating behaviour. This study presents a comparative analysis of the electrochemical responses of these two classes of active materials using a multi-particle phase-field model, the structure and description of which are designed to promote easy interpretation by non-modelling experts. Current pulses and open-circuit relaxations, such as those in the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), are simulated for different solid-state diffusion coefficients and particle size distributions. The distinct electrode potential responses are explained through the dynamic intra- and inter-particle lithium distributions and their interplay with active material thermodynamics. In solid-solution active materials, numerical results indicate that the solid-state diffusion coefficient tends to be underestimated by the GITT. In phase-separating active materials, current pulses instead generate a shrinking-core lithium distribution along the particle radius (e.g. the Li-rich phase at the particle surface and the Li-poor phase at the particle centre), so that only the phase nucleated at the particle surface can be electrochemically probed in terms of its diffusion and kinetic properties. Such a shrinking-core distribution represents a quasi-equilibrium configuration for a phase-separating active material, resulting in fast electrode potential relaxation upon current interruption and impeding any inter-particle lithium exchange. In fact, while small particles lithiate faster for both active materials during current pulses, the rest phases enable lithium homogenisation among the particles of a solid-solution active material, which can be adequately simulated using a single equivalent particle radius. In contrast, the absence of inter-particle lithium exchange at open circuit in phase-separating active materials may result in over-lithiation of small particles. This poses limitations to single-particle modelling for phase-separating active materials and highlights the need for carefully calibrated rest phases in pulse fast-charging protocols to facilitate inter-particle lithium exchange when the electrode is in an out-of-equilibrium configuration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics Energy
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/ade5ca
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electrochemical diffusion signatures of solid-solution and phase-separating active materials in Li-ion batteries

Antonio Bertei, Marco Lagnoni
3 citations
Journal of Physics Energy
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.19
article

Electrochemical diffusion signatures of solid-solution and phase-separating active materials in Li-ion batteries

Antonio Bertei, Marco Lagnoni
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The working principle of lithium-ion batteries lies in the intercalation of lithium ions in electrode active materials, which exhibit either solid-solution or phase-separating behaviour. This study presents a comparative analysis of the electrochemical responses of these two classes of active materials using a multi-particle phase-field model, the structure and description of which are designed to promote easy interpretation by non-modelling experts. Current pulses and open-circuit relaxations, such as those in the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT), are simulated for different solid-state diffusion coefficients and particle size distributions. The distinct electrode potential responses are explained through the dynamic intra- and inter-particle lithium distributions and their interplay with active material thermodynamics. In solid-solution active materials, numerical results indicate that the solid-state diffusion coefficient tends to be underestimated by the GITT. In phase-separating active materials, current pulses instead generate a shrinking-core lithium distribution along the particle radius (e.g. the Li-rich phase at the particle surface and the Li-poor phase at the particle centre), so that only the phase nucleated at the particle surface can be electrochemically probed in terms of its diffusion and kinetic properties. Such a shrinking-core distribution represents a quasi-equilibrium configuration for a phase-separating active material, resulting in fast electrode potential relaxation upon current interruption and impeding any inter-particle lithium exchange. In fact, while small particles lithiate faster for both active materials during current pulses, the rest phases enable lithium homogenisation among the particles of a solid-solution active material, which can be adequately simulated using a single equivalent particle radius. In contrast, the absence of inter-particle lithium exchange at open circuit in phase-separating active materials may result in over-lithiation of small particles. This poses limitations to single-particle modelling for phase-separating active materials and highlights the need for carefully calibrated rest phases in pulse fast-charging protocols to facilitate inter-particle lithium exchange when the electrode is in an out-of-equilibrium configuration.

Journal of Physics EnergyVol. 7(3)
University of Pisa (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Advancements in Battery Materials
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.