Experimental assessment of CO2 rebreathing in closed-circuit CPAP therapy with different non-invasive interfaces

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is a non-invasive ventilation therapy that supports respiratory function by improving functional residual capacity and maintaining open airways through positive pressure. Closed-circuit CPAP configurations are emerging as a promising alternative to conventional open circuits, offering several advantages. However, their effectiveness can be compromised by CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing. This study aimed to quantify inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> levels during closed-circuit CPAP therapy with different interfaces and explore the effects of interface volume, inlet and outlet port position and airflow rates on CO<sub>2</sub> accumulation. Four helmets, differing in port positioning, and One-port and Two-ports total-face Masks were tested under three flow conditions (0, 60, and 80 l/min) using an ad hoc test bench to measure CO<sub>2</sub> accumulation inside the interface. Results demonstrated that interface design strongly influenced CO<sub>2</sub> retention. Lateral Inlet/Lateral Outlet Helmet (current commercial helmet) showed the highest inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> levels (about 2 %), while the Up Inlet/Front Outlet Helmet achieved lower inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> (0.6 % at 80 l/min). Masks, characterized by smaller volumes, consistently exhibited lower CO<sub>2</sub> retention. Notably, the Two-ports Mask maintained inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> levels below 1 % (patient safety threshold) even without additional recirculation airflow. Increasing flow rates effectively reduced CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing, with the most pronounced reduction occurring between 0 and 60 l/min. These findings highlight the critical role of interface design, particularly port positioning, in minimizing CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing. The results enabled selection of safe interfaces for closed-circuit CPAP. Furthermore, these findings can be extended to conventional open-circuit CPAP therapy, enhancing patient safety in non-invasive ventilation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanics
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112826
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental assessment of CO2 rebreathing in closed-circuit CPAP therapy with different non-invasive interfaces

Mara Terzini, Giovanni Putame, Alberto Audenino, Simone Borrelli et al.
Journal of Biomechanics
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Experimental assessment of CO2 rebreathing in closed-circuit CPAP therapy with different non-invasive interfaces

Mara Terzini, Giovanni Putame, Alberto Audenino, Simone Borrelli, Andrea Formaggio, Carlo Olivieri, Margherita De Luca
article en

Abstract

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) is a non-invasive ventilation therapy that supports respiratory function by improving functional residual capacity and maintaining open airways through positive pressure. Closed-circuit CPAP configurations are emerging as a promising alternative to conventional open circuits, offering several advantages. However, their effectiveness can be compromised by CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing. This study aimed to quantify inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> levels during closed-circuit CPAP therapy with different interfaces and explore the effects of interface volume, inlet and outlet port position and airflow rates on CO<sub>2</sub> accumulation. Four helmets, differing in port positioning, and One-port and Two-ports total-face Masks were tested under three flow conditions (0, 60, and 80 l/min) using an ad hoc test bench to measure CO<sub>2</sub> accumulation inside the interface. Results demonstrated that interface design strongly influenced CO<sub>2</sub> retention. Lateral Inlet/Lateral Outlet Helmet (current commercial helmet) showed the highest inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> levels (about 2 %), while the Up Inlet/Front Outlet Helmet achieved lower inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> (0.6 % at 80 l/min). Masks, characterized by smaller volumes, consistently exhibited lower CO<sub>2</sub> retention. Notably, the Two-ports Mask maintained inhaled CO<sub>2</sub> levels below 1 % (patient safety threshold) even without additional recirculation airflow. Increasing flow rates effectively reduced CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing, with the most pronounced reduction occurring between 0 and 60 l/min. These findings highlight the critical role of interface design, particularly port positioning, in minimizing CO<sub>2</sub> rebreathing. The results enabled selection of safe interfaces for closed-circuit CPAP. Furthermore, these findings can be extended to conventional open-circuit CPAP therapy, enhancing patient safety in non-invasive ventilation.

Journal of BiomechanicsVol. 189
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.