Measuring the quality of generative AI systems: Mapping metrics to quality characteristics — Snowballing literature review

: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized tasks that previously required significant human effort, which has attracted considerable interest from industry stakeholders. This growing interest has accelerated the integration of AI models into various industrial applications. However, the model integration introduces challenges to product quality, as conventional quality measuring methods may fail to assess GenAI systems. Consequently, evaluation techniques for GenAI systems need to be adapted and refined. Examining the current state and applicability of evaluation techniques for the GenAI system outputs is essential. : This study aims to explore the current metrics, methods, and processes for assessing the outputs of GenAI systems and the potential of risky outputs. : We performed a snowballing literature review to identify metrics, evaluation methods, and evaluation processes from 43 selected papers. : We identified 28 metrics and mapped these metrics to four quality characteristics defined by the ISO/IEC 25023 standard for software systems. Additionally, we discovered three types of evaluation methods to measure the quality of system outputs and a three-step process to assess faulty system outputs. Based on these insights, we suggested a five-step framework for measuring system quality while utilizing GenAI models. : Our findings present a mapping that visualizes candidate metrics to be selected for measuring quality characteristics of GenAI systems, accompanied by step-by-step processes to assist practitioners in conducting quality assessments. • Mapping current metrics to quality characteristics of GenAI systems. • Evaluation methods showing metrics’ applicability in different business domains. • Processes that use metrics to measure incorrect, biased, and harmful outputs of GenAI systems. • A suggested framework for selecting metrics to assess GenAI system qualities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Software Technology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107802
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring the quality of generative AI systems: Mapping metrics to quality characteristics — Snowballing literature review

Panagiota Chatzipetrou, Tony Gorschek, Liang Yu, Emil Alégroth
4 citations
Information and Software Technology
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
9.92
article

Measuring the quality of generative AI systems: Mapping metrics to quality characteristics — Snowballing literature review

Panagiota Chatzipetrou, Tony Gorschek, Liang Yu, Emil Alégroth
article en
4 citations

Abstract

: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized tasks that previously required significant human effort, which has attracted considerable interest from industry stakeholders. This growing interest has accelerated the integration of AI models into various industrial applications. However, the model integration introduces challenges to product quality, as conventional quality measuring methods may fail to assess GenAI systems. Consequently, evaluation techniques for GenAI systems need to be adapted and refined. Examining the current state and applicability of evaluation techniques for the GenAI system outputs is essential. : This study aims to explore the current metrics, methods, and processes for assessing the outputs of GenAI systems and the potential of risky outputs. : We performed a snowballing literature review to identify metrics, evaluation methods, and evaluation processes from 43 selected papers. : We identified 28 metrics and mapped these metrics to four quality characteristics defined by the ISO/IEC 25023 standard for software systems. Additionally, we discovered three types of evaluation methods to measure the quality of system outputs and a three-step process to assess faulty system outputs. Based on these insights, we suggested a five-step framework for measuring system quality while utilizing GenAI models. : Our findings present a mapping that visualizes candidate metrics to be selected for measuring quality characteristics of GenAI systems, accompanied by step-by-step processes to assist practitioners in conducting quality assessments. • Mapping current metrics to quality characteristics of GenAI systems. • Evaluation methods showing metrics’ applicability in different business domains. • Processes that use metrics to measure incorrect, biased, and harmful outputs of GenAI systems. • A suggested framework for selecting metrics to assess GenAI system qualities.

Information and Software TechnologyVol. 186
Ericsson (Sweden) (SE), Örebro University (SE), Region Blekinge (SE), Fortiss (DE), Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.