Session 6. Oral Presentation for: The business case for abatement: the key levers for improving financial return of marginal abatement projects

Presented on 27 May 2025: Session 6 Emissions abatement projects often do not progress because they cannot meet the investment hurdles applied to projects. So what conditions are needed to create a compelling business case for a marginal abatement project? This paper describes the key levers for improving the business case, such as the global warming potential of methane, shadow carbon price, sales gas value, common user infrastructure and payback period. Drawing on examples from the natural gas production sector, it describes abatement projects that tend to be marginally negative in terms of return on investment and what conditions are needed to change that into a positive return. In many cases, small changes are enough to switch the economics into a positive outcome. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep24462
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 6. Oral Presentation for: The business case for abatement: the key levers for improving financial return of marginal abatement projects

Jessica Dwyer
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

Session 6. Oral Presentation for: The business case for abatement: the key levers for improving financial return of marginal abatement projects

Jessica Dwyer
article en

Abstract

Presented on 27 May 2025: Session 6 Emissions abatement projects often do not progress because they cannot meet the investment hurdles applied to projects. So what conditions are needed to create a compelling business case for a marginal abatement project? This paper describes the key levers for improving the business case, such as the global warming potential of methane, shadow carbon price, sales gas value, common user infrastructure and payback period. Drawing on examples from the natural gas production sector, it describes abatement projects that tend to be marginally negative in terms of return on investment and what conditions are needed to change that into a positive return. In many cases, small changes are enough to switch the economics into a positive outcome. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 65(4)
Ridley College (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Session 6. Oral Presentation for: The business case for abatement: the key levers for improving financial return of marginal abatement projects — Jessica Dwyer · Australian Energy Producers journal. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS