Session 7. Oral Presentation for: Improving operational confidence and decision-making in the absence of key reservoir data through utilisation of a machine learning-based coal identification model in coal seam gas wells

Presented on 27 May 2025: Session 7 This study investigates the feasibility of using machine learning algorithms to identify the presence of coal (at a scale comparable to wireline logging), utilising drilling parameters from coal seam gas (CSG) wells located in the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Generally, during the drilling operation and before wireline logging, the presence of coal lithologies is inferred from elevated gas levels liberated into the drilling mud. However, the reliability of gas sensors can be compromised, necessitating operations geologists to rely on fluctuating drilling parameters to make decisions. To address this, a supervised classification model using the XGBoost algorithm has been developed to predict coal in the absence of reliable gas sensor data, improving data available to the operations geologists for decision-making purposes. Trained on data from over 150 wells, the classification model identifies coal lithologies by analysing typically available, high-resolution drilling parameters. While these parameters vary due to physical changes in the drilled lithology, they are also significantly overprinted by operational factors. Underpinned by iterative exploratory data analysis, the machine learning workflow involved processing a large amount of raw data, defining the predictive target, feature engineering and model development. Traditional machine learning performance metrics, such as F1 score, recall and precision, have been used in conjunction with business-based metrics to compare model iterations. Even though the model faces challenges related to class imbalances, overfitting and variable operational environments, results demonstrate the utility in predicting the location of coal and assisting operational geology workflows in wells where gas readings are unreliable or unavailable. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep24534
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 7. Oral Presentation for: Improving operational confidence and decision-making in the absence of key reservoir data through utilisation of a machine learning-based coal identification model in coal seam gas wells

Gonzalo Vázquez
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Mineral Processing and Grinding
article

Session 7. Oral Presentation for: Improving operational confidence and decision-making in the absence of key reservoir data through utilisation of a machine learning-based coal identification model in coal seam gas wells

Gonzalo Vázquez
article en

Abstract

Presented on 27 May 2025: Session 7 This study investigates the feasibility of using machine learning algorithms to identify the presence of coal (at a scale comparable to wireline logging), utilising drilling parameters from coal seam gas (CSG) wells located in the Surat Basin, Queensland, Australia. Generally, during the drilling operation and before wireline logging, the presence of coal lithologies is inferred from elevated gas levels liberated into the drilling mud. However, the reliability of gas sensors can be compromised, necessitating operations geologists to rely on fluctuating drilling parameters to make decisions. To address this, a supervised classification model using the XGBoost algorithm has been developed to predict coal in the absence of reliable gas sensor data, improving data available to the operations geologists for decision-making purposes. Trained on data from over 150 wells, the classification model identifies coal lithologies by analysing typically available, high-resolution drilling parameters. While these parameters vary due to physical changes in the drilled lithology, they are also significantly overprinted by operational factors. Underpinned by iterative exploratory data analysis, the machine learning workflow involved processing a large amount of raw data, defining the predictive target, feature engineering and model development. Traditional machine learning performance metrics, such as F1 score, recall and precision, have been used in conjunction with business-based metrics to compare model iterations. Even though the model faces challenges related to class imbalances, overfitting and variable operational environments, results demonstrate the utility in predicting the location of coal and assisting operational geology workflows in wells where gas readings are unreliable or unavailable. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 65(4)
Ergon Energy (Australia) (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Session 7. Oral Presentation for: Improving operational confidence and decision-making in the absence of key reservoir data through utilisation of a machine learning-based coal identification model in coal seam gas wells — Gonzalo Vázquez · Australian Energy Producers journal. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS