Session 9. Oral Presentation for: Queensland’s coal seam gas (CSG) projects – hard won lessons relevant to regional development

Presented on 27 May 2025: Session 9 This paper reflects on 10 years of research and experience in Queensland’s coal seam gas (CSG) development, focusing on social performance and outcomes for regional stakeholders. In this time, CSG operators have executed hundreds of land access and compensation agreements with landholders. Agreements, the contract between landholders and upstream operators, provide the legal framework for coexistence on overlapping tenure. Historically, the primary overlap of interests has been between farming and gas development, but there are also overlaps between CSG operations and coal mining areas and intensive agricultural interests such as feedlots, piggeries and regional towns that have had to be negotiated. Although trust in CSG companies has increased over time, and longitudinal social and economic indicators show regional benefits, there have been divisive issues around groundwater management, ‘gassy’ water bores, land and river gas seeps, and subsidence, where each have presented and continue to present challenges to landholders, communities, operators and regulators. Environmental performance, and particularly matters related to water quality and availability, are of critical importance to broader social performance. A qualitative assessment of CSG operations against the International Energy Agency’s Golden Rules of Gas shows that the industry scored well on the continuous improvement scale, with lower scores in community engagement and regional coordination. In summation, we identify lessons that can be learned from the CSG-liquefied natural gas industry around best practices and behaviours to avoid that are relevant to renewable energy developers, transmission projects and the critical minerals industry as they seek to expand throughout minerals provinces of Queensland. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep24496
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 9. Oral Presentation for: Queensland’s coal seam gas (CSG) projects – hard won lessons relevant to regional development

Katherine Witt
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Mining and Resource Management
article

Session 9. Oral Presentation for: Queensland’s coal seam gas (CSG) projects – hard won lessons relevant to regional development

Katherine Witt
article en

Abstract

Presented on 27 May 2025: Session 9 This paper reflects on 10 years of research and experience in Queensland’s coal seam gas (CSG) development, focusing on social performance and outcomes for regional stakeholders. In this time, CSG operators have executed hundreds of land access and compensation agreements with landholders. Agreements, the contract between landholders and upstream operators, provide the legal framework for coexistence on overlapping tenure. Historically, the primary overlap of interests has been between farming and gas development, but there are also overlaps between CSG operations and coal mining areas and intensive agricultural interests such as feedlots, piggeries and regional towns that have had to be negotiated. Although trust in CSG companies has increased over time, and longitudinal social and economic indicators show regional benefits, there have been divisive issues around groundwater management, ‘gassy’ water bores, land and river gas seeps, and subsidence, where each have presented and continue to present challenges to landholders, communities, operators and regulators. Environmental performance, and particularly matters related to water quality and availability, are of critical importance to broader social performance. A qualitative assessment of CSG operations against the International Energy Agency’s Golden Rules of Gas shows that the industry scored well on the continuous improvement scale, with lower scores in community engagement and regional coordination. In summation, we identify lessons that can be learned from the CSG-liquefied natural gas industry around best practices and behaviours to avoid that are relevant to renewable energy developers, transmission projects and the critical minerals industry as they seek to expand throughout minerals provinces of Queensland. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 65(4)
The University of Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Mining and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Session 9. Oral Presentation for: Queensland’s coal seam gas (CSG) projects – hard won lessons relevant to regional development — Katherine Witt · Australian Energy Producers journal. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS