Session 16. Oral Presentation for: Geomechanical modelling of hydrogen storage at the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre

Presented on 28 May 2025: Session 16 As part of the former ‘Exploring for the Future’ program (2016–2024), the Australian Government committed significant resources to lay the foundations for the nation’s future hydrogen economy. One component was to understand how to identify, characterise, and operate potential hydrogen storage sites. This paper presents a case study of hydrogen storage in a depleted gas field, focusing on geomechanical behaviour, using data from the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre in Australia. This study is the first to compare fluid dynamic behaviour and geomechanical risks of hydrogen storage with the more extensively studied methane and carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. At reservoir depth, hydrogen exhibits large differences in density, compressibility, viscosity, and thermal properties compared to the other gases, necessitating different operational approaches for underground storage. The study’s uniqueness lies in the inclusion of coupled reservoir geomechanics with thermal simulation in reservoir and cap rock, using a high-resolution grid around the wellbore. A key finding is that hydrogen storage causes significantly less thermal perturbation compared to methane and CO2 storage under an identical reservoir injection volume. The fault reactivation and wellbore fracturing risk due to thermally-induced stress changes are lower in hydrogen storage compared to CO2 storage. Simulations suggest that reducing the injection rate dampens both temperature and pressure effects, further reducing the risk of wellbore fracturing and fault reactivation. This study highlights the potential advantages of integrating reservoir flow simulation with geomechanical risk assessment. Implementing dynamic control mechanisms in coupled simulations could optimise injection rates without compromising underground storage safety. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Energy Producers journal.
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ep24486
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Session 16. Oral Presentation for: Geomechanical modelling of hydrogen storage at the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre

Zachariah John Pallikathekathil
Australian Energy Producers journal.
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Session 16. Oral Presentation for: Geomechanical modelling of hydrogen storage at the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre

Zachariah John Pallikathekathil
article en

Abstract

Presented on 28 May 2025: Session 16 As part of the former ‘Exploring for the Future’ program (2016–2024), the Australian Government committed significant resources to lay the foundations for the nation’s future hydrogen economy. One component was to understand how to identify, characterise, and operate potential hydrogen storage sites. This paper presents a case study of hydrogen storage in a depleted gas field, focusing on geomechanical behaviour, using data from the CO2CRC Otway International Test Centre in Australia. This study is the first to compare fluid dynamic behaviour and geomechanical risks of hydrogen storage with the more extensively studied methane and carbon dioxide (CO2) storage. At reservoir depth, hydrogen exhibits large differences in density, compressibility, viscosity, and thermal properties compared to the other gases, necessitating different operational approaches for underground storage. The study’s uniqueness lies in the inclusion of coupled reservoir geomechanics with thermal simulation in reservoir and cap rock, using a high-resolution grid around the wellbore. A key finding is that hydrogen storage causes significantly less thermal perturbation compared to methane and CO2 storage under an identical reservoir injection volume. The fault reactivation and wellbore fracturing risk due to thermally-induced stress changes are lower in hydrogen storage compared to CO2 storage. Simulations suggest that reducing the injection rate dampens both temperature and pressure effects, further reducing the risk of wellbore fracturing and fault reactivation. This study highlights the potential advantages of integrating reservoir flow simulation with geomechanical risk assessment. Implementing dynamic control mechanisms in coupled simulations could optimise injection rates without compromising underground storage safety. To access the Oral Presentation click the link below. To read the full paper click here

Australian Energy Producers journal.Vol. 65(4)
The Kids Research Institute Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.