Awareness of Women’s History and Interpretation of Primitive Matriarchy by Colonial Joseon Socialists in the 1920s and early 1930s

This article focuses on how socialist intellectuals in colonial Joseon during the 1920s to early 1930s wrote about women’s history by translating and utilizing Friedrich Engels’ The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State(1884) and August Bebel’s Woman and Socialism(1879), with particular attention to their emphasis on the concept of primitive matriarchy and its implications. First, the use of Engels’ The Origin left room for interpretations that justified the formation of female oppression and patriarchy. This was a result of male socialists’ use of The Origin, which was based on assumptions of naturalized gender division of labor and women’s alienation from tools and technology. Meanwhile, Bebel’s Woman and Socialism differs from The Origin in that it addresses the women’s problems independently and places greater emphasis on matriarchy and matriarchal tradition. For example, Choi Jeong-hee seems to have paid attention to the the matriarchal tradition of ancient Joseon society. In this way, the fact highlights the need to examine the translation and appropriation of socialist knowledge from a gendered perspective.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of History
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2025.05.151.75
Primary Topic
Asian Culture and Media Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awareness of Women’s History and Interpretation of Primitive Matriarchy by Colonial Joseon Socialists in the 1920s and early 1930s

Myung-jae Kim
Critical Review of History
Asian Culture and Media Studies
article

Awareness of Women’s History and Interpretation of Primitive Matriarchy by Colonial Joseon Socialists in the 1920s and early 1930s

Myung-jae Kim
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on how socialist intellectuals in colonial Joseon during the 1920s to early 1930s wrote about women’s history by translating and utilizing Friedrich Engels’ The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State(1884) and August Bebel’s Woman and Socialism(1879), with particular attention to their emphasis on the concept of primitive matriarchy and its implications. First, the use of Engels’ The Origin left room for interpretations that justified the formation of female oppression and patriarchy. This was a result of male socialists’ use of The Origin, which was based on assumptions of naturalized gender division of labor and women’s alienation from tools and technology. Meanwhile, Bebel’s Woman and Socialism differs from The Origin in that it addresses the women’s problems independently and places greater emphasis on matriarchy and matriarchal tradition. For example, Choi Jeong-hee seems to have paid attention to the the matriarchal tradition of ancient Joseon society. In this way, the fact highlights the need to examine the translation and appropriation of socialist knowledge from a gendered perspective.

Critical Review of HistoryVol. 151
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Asian Culture and Media Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Awareness of Women’s History and Interpretation of Primitive Matriarchy by Colonial Joseon Socialists in the 1920s and early 1930s — Myung-jae Kim · Critical Review of History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS