Two Socialisms of Socialist Reading Groups in Colonial Korea

This paper case-studies the reading lists of thirty socialist reading groups in colonial Korea from the late 1920s to the early 1930s. It finds that the reading groups of peasants and workers, on the one hand, read Yamakawa Hitoshi’s Shihonshugi no Karakuri (The Mechanism of Capitalism) and Sakai Toshihiko’s Shakaishugi Taii (An Outline of Socialism) as their main texts, while the groups of vanguard youth and revolutionary mass movement, on the other, read the Communist Youth International’s Musansha Seiji Kyōtei (Political Program for the Proletariat). In peasants and workers’ readings, socialism was understood as the socialization of production and property under Marxist principles, which was to be achieved by proletarian class struggle. In contrast, the vanguard youth’s textbooks emphasized Leninism, identified socialism as being materialized by the Soviet Union, and demanded a communist party-led Korean and world revolution following the Soviet and Comintern’s lead. Witnessing the coexistence of these two schools, the paper suggests that the socialism did not progress linearly from Marxism to Leninism, and that it had a hierarchy within itself.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Review of History
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38080/crh.2025.05.151.44
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two Socialisms of Socialist Reading Groups in Colonial Korea

Hyong-Yerl Cho
Critical Review of History
Japanese History and Culture
article

Two Socialisms of Socialist Reading Groups in Colonial Korea

Hyong-Yerl Cho
article en

Abstract

This paper case-studies the reading lists of thirty socialist reading groups in colonial Korea from the late 1920s to the early 1930s. It finds that the reading groups of peasants and workers, on the one hand, read Yamakawa Hitoshi’s Shihonshugi no Karakuri (The Mechanism of Capitalism) and Sakai Toshihiko’s Shakaishugi Taii (An Outline of Socialism) as their main texts, while the groups of vanguard youth and revolutionary mass movement, on the other, read the Communist Youth International’s Musansha Seiji Kyōtei (Political Program for the Proletariat). In peasants and workers’ readings, socialism was understood as the socialization of production and property under Marxist principles, which was to be achieved by proletarian class struggle. In contrast, the vanguard youth’s textbooks emphasized Leninism, identified socialism as being materialized by the Soviet Union, and demanded a communist party-led Korean and world revolution following the Soviet and Comintern’s lead. Witnessing the coexistence of these two schools, the paper suggests that the socialism did not progress linearly from Marxism to Leninism, and that it had a hierarchy within itself.

Critical Review of HistoryVol. 151
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.