The Block in the Field: Intensive Out-of-Classroom Experiences

The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which block field trips constitute authentic generative learning opportunities for students and effective curricular choices for instructors. The field trips featured in this research are situated within the context of work integrated learning (WIL) (e.g., Sachs, Rowe, & Wilson, 2016). The theoretical frame used in this study is the WIL Framework developed by Campbell et al. (2019) whose four domains of practice are the student experience, curriculum design, institutional requirements, and stakeholder engagement. Case study methods are used, supported by the interpretivist approaches used in phenomenography. Four types of field trips provide case studies which are analyzed according to their contexts, strengths, challenges, opportunities, and risks. Results of this research reveal that for field trips within the block model, faculty preparation, disciplinary accessibility to field excursions, administrative expectations, student commitment, and user-friendliness of field trip sites must be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15209/jbilt.1360
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Employability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Block in the Field: Intensive Out-of-Classroom Experiences

Thomas R. Yeager, Christian Gilde, Laura Straus, Michelle Prawer
Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching
Higher Education and Employability
article

The Block in the Field: Intensive Out-of-Classroom Experiences

Thomas R. Yeager, Christian Gilde, Laura Straus, Michelle Prawer
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the extent to which block field trips constitute authentic generative learning opportunities for students and effective curricular choices for instructors. The field trips featured in this research are situated within the context of work integrated learning (WIL) (e.g., Sachs, Rowe, & Wilson, 2016). The theoretical frame used in this study is the WIL Framework developed by Campbell et al. (2019) whose four domains of practice are the student experience, curriculum design, institutional requirements, and stakeholder engagement. Case study methods are used, supported by the interpretivist approaches used in phenomenography. Four types of field trips provide case studies which are analyzed according to their contexts, strengths, challenges, opportunities, and risks. Results of this research reveal that for field trips within the block model, faculty preparation, disciplinary accessibility to field excursions, administrative expectations, student commitment, and user-friendliness of field trip sites must be considered.

Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and TeachingVol. 3(1)
University of Montana Western (US), Victoria University (AU), Western University of Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Higher Education and Employability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.