Do Online Maths tools improve undergraduate mathematics outcomes within the block teaching model?

A notable decline in secondary mathematics enrolment has raised concerns over numerical capacity and readiness for STEM learning in tertiary education over recent years. This has prompted some university academics to shift from traditional pedagogical delivery methods to a constructivist teaching approach such as incorporating online teaching tools within a more interactive learning environment. While some online tools have been purpose build, none to the best of our knowledge have been contextualised for biomedical sciences, or supported by research into their effectiveness when taught within the block teaching model. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of freely available online mathematics learning tools when applied to the biomedical sciences taught in a time compressed block teaching format. One hundred and seventy-six first year students completed a survey reflecting on their level of comfort, competence, and enjoyment of mathematics, including their highest level of previous study in the discipline. Students were also surveyed about their tertiary entrance rank and completed a short quiz to establish their pre-learning numeracy skill baseline. Students completed a post-unit assessment at the end of each unit, together with a survey about the extent of their online tool usage. Our results show that there is significant improvement (p<0.001) when students supplemented their learning using online maths tools, by a clear pre versus post increase in tests results. This improvement was statistically significant and remained consistent across all identified ability groups. However, this improvement was not linked to the students’ university entrance rank score and interestingly nor was the result skewed by differential group usage of the online resources provided.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15209/jbilt.1359
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Online Maths tools improve undergraduate mathematics outcomes within the block teaching model?

Puspha Sinnayah, Calum Downie, Rudi Klein
Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and Teaching
Online and Blended Learning
article

Do Online Maths tools improve undergraduate mathematics outcomes within the block teaching model?

Puspha Sinnayah, Calum Downie, Rudi Klein
article en

Abstract

A notable decline in secondary mathematics enrolment has raised concerns over numerical capacity and readiness for STEM learning in tertiary education over recent years. This has prompted some university academics to shift from traditional pedagogical delivery methods to a constructivist teaching approach such as incorporating online teaching tools within a more interactive learning environment. While some online tools have been purpose build, none to the best of our knowledge have been contextualised for biomedical sciences, or supported by research into their effectiveness when taught within the block teaching model. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of freely available online mathematics learning tools when applied to the biomedical sciences taught in a time compressed block teaching format. One hundred and seventy-six first year students completed a survey reflecting on their level of comfort, competence, and enjoyment of mathematics, including their highest level of previous study in the discipline. Students were also surveyed about their tertiary entrance rank and completed a short quiz to establish their pre-learning numeracy skill baseline. Students completed a post-unit assessment at the end of each unit, together with a survey about the extent of their online tool usage. Our results show that there is significant improvement (p<0.001) when students supplemented their learning using online maths tools, by a clear pre versus post increase in tests results. This improvement was statistically significant and remained consistent across all identified ability groups. However, this improvement was not linked to the students’ university entrance rank score and interestingly nor was the result skewed by differential group usage of the online resources provided.

Journal of Block and Intensive Learning and TeachingVol. 3(1)
Torrens University Australia (AU), Victoria University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.