Evaluating Copositivity Patterns in Fragrance/Botanical Patch Testing through Hierarchical Clustering and Network Analysis

<u><b><i></i></b></u> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Fragrances/botanicals are ubiquitous allergens. Patients allergic to one fragrance/botanical are frequently sensitive to other fragrances/botanicals and are typically counseled to avoid all fragrances/botanicals. However, broad avoidance of all fragrances/botanicals may not be clinically necessary.<u><b><i>Objectives:</i></b></u> We examined copositivity patterns in fragrance/botanical patch testing.<u><b><i>Methods:</i></b></u> The Mayo Clinic patch test database was queried for pairwise copositivity rates for fragrances/botanicals between 1997 and 2022, representing a total of 43 allergens. Data analyzed included 4706 positive reactions out of 252,485 total patches applied to 15,864 patients. After background correction for general positivity, copositivity rates were organized through unsupervised hierarchical clustering to determine copositivity subgroups and then evaluated through network analysis.<u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> After background correction, clustering revealed distinct copositivity subgroups: Fragrance Mix I-<i>Myroxylon pereirae</i>-limonene hydroperoxides-linalool hydroperoxides; Compositae Mix-sesquiterpene lactone-parthenolide; Fragrance Mix II-Lyral; lichen acid mix-treemoss extract; menthol-<i>Mentha piperita</i>; narcissus-dandelion; and <i>Santalum album</i>-trans-anethole-tea tree-lemongrass-clove-turpentine-<i>Rosa damascena</i>-<i>Lavandula</i>-<i>Geranium</i>-<i>Cananga odorata</i>-neroli-bergamot. In addition, there were further isolated intergroup copositivity reactions seen in network analysis.<u><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b></u> Background correction followed by hierarchical clustering demonstrated the fragrance/botanical group can be divided into multiple copositivity subgroups. Combined with network analysis, patients with a positive patch test to one fragrance/botanical allergen may be preferentially guided to use specific other fragrances/botanicals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatitis
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/derm.2024.0442
Primary Topic
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Copositivity Patterns in Fragrance/Botanical Patch Testing through Hierarchical Clustering and Network Analysis

Dayne Voelker, Mark D.P. Davis, James A. Yiannias, Matthew R. Hall et al.
1 links
Dermatitis
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
article

Evaluating Copositivity Patterns in Fragrance/Botanical Patch Testing through Hierarchical Clustering and Network Analysis

Dayne Voelker, Mark D.P. Davis, James A. Yiannias, Matthew R. Hall, Yul W. Yang, Molly J. Youssef
article en

Abstract

<u><b><i></i></b></u> <u><b><i>Background:</i></b></u> Fragrances/botanicals are ubiquitous allergens. Patients allergic to one fragrance/botanical are frequently sensitive to other fragrances/botanicals and are typically counseled to avoid all fragrances/botanicals. However, broad avoidance of all fragrances/botanicals may not be clinically necessary.<u><b><i>Objectives:</i></b></u> We examined copositivity patterns in fragrance/botanical patch testing.<u><b><i>Methods:</i></b></u> The Mayo Clinic patch test database was queried for pairwise copositivity rates for fragrances/botanicals between 1997 and 2022, representing a total of 43 allergens. Data analyzed included 4706 positive reactions out of 252,485 total patches applied to 15,864 patients. After background correction for general positivity, copositivity rates were organized through unsupervised hierarchical clustering to determine copositivity subgroups and then evaluated through network analysis.<u><b><i>Results:</i></b></u> After background correction, clustering revealed distinct copositivity subgroups: Fragrance Mix I-<i>Myroxylon pereirae</i>-limonene hydroperoxides-linalool hydroperoxides; Compositae Mix-sesquiterpene lactone-parthenolide; Fragrance Mix II-Lyral; lichen acid mix-treemoss extract; menthol-<i>Mentha piperita</i>; narcissus-dandelion; and <i>Santalum album</i>-trans-anethole-tea tree-lemongrass-clove-turpentine-<i>Rosa damascena</i>-<i>Lavandula</i>-<i>Geranium</i>-<i>Cananga odorata</i>-neroli-bergamot. In addition, there were further isolated intergroup copositivity reactions seen in network analysis.<u><b><i>Conclusions:</i></b></u> Background correction followed by hierarchical clustering demonstrated the fragrance/botanical group can be divided into multiple copositivity subgroups. Combined with network analysis, patients with a positive patch test to one fragrance/botanical allergen may be preferentially guided to use specific other fragrances/botanicals.

DermatitisVol. 37(1)
Mayo Clinic (US), Jacksonville College (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic Health System (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.