Protocol for a mixed-methods effectiveness evaluation of the community-led child protection approach (Seeds) in La Guajira, Colombia

Globally, an estimated one billion children experience violence every year. The prevalence of violence is anticipated to be higher in low-and middle-income countries and particularly in humanitarian contexts. Colombia faces a protracted humanitarian crisis. It is affected by long-lasting internal conflict, high levels of community violence, the climate crisis, and migration due to the political crisis in Venezuela. The aim of this mixed-method study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-led child protection approach ( Seeds ) in La Guajira, Colombia. The study will be conducted in eight communities, randomly allocated to the intervention and control arms. Data will be collected from children and adults involved in Seeds activities, children targeted by community action, and natural helpers. The study will be conducted in La Guajira, a department in northern Colombia, with close proximity to the Venezuelan border and a history of armed conflict. The study will follow a convergent parallel mixed-methods design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected in parallel, analyzed separately, and then merged for interpretation. The quantitative arm of the study will follow a matched-control quasi-experimental design using a waitlist control. Qualitative data will be collected using semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. The results of the study will help address the lack of rigorous evidence on approaches to prevent violence against children, broaden understanding of changes driven by community-led child protection approaches, and offer an example of how to overcome challenges in evaluating community-led and prevention approaches. • Evaluating a community-led child protection approach (Seeds) using a mixed-methods design. • The evaluation approach enhances understanding of changes in outcomes driven by community-led child protection approaches. • Findings of an earlier study on the community-led approach suggest a positive change among community leaders regarding child protection, such as increased agency of community members, especially youth, and identification of positive protective factors for children. • The community-led methodology draws on the WHO community engagement framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Protection and Practice
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100201
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protocol for a mixed-methods effectiveness evaluation of the community-led child protection approach (Seeds) in La Guajira, Colombia

Gabriela V. Koppenol‐Gonzalez, Ria Reis, Rinske Everarda Catharina Ellermeijer, María Cecilia Dedios Sanguineti et al.
Child Protection and Practice
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Protocol for a mixed-methods effectiveness evaluation of the community-led child protection approach (Seeds) in La Guajira, Colombia

Gabriela V. Koppenol‐Gonzalez, Ria Reis, Rinske Everarda Catharina Ellermeijer, María Cecilia Dedios Sanguineti, Mark J. D. Jordans, Lauren Stephens, Juan Jose Castellanos Piedrahita
article en

Abstract

Globally, an estimated one billion children experience violence every year. The prevalence of violence is anticipated to be higher in low-and middle-income countries and particularly in humanitarian contexts. Colombia faces a protracted humanitarian crisis. It is affected by long-lasting internal conflict, high levels of community violence, the climate crisis, and migration due to the political crisis in Venezuela. The aim of this mixed-method study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a community-led child protection approach ( Seeds ) in La Guajira, Colombia. The study will be conducted in eight communities, randomly allocated to the intervention and control arms. Data will be collected from children and adults involved in Seeds activities, children targeted by community action, and natural helpers. The study will be conducted in La Guajira, a department in northern Colombia, with close proximity to the Venezuelan border and a history of armed conflict. The study will follow a convergent parallel mixed-methods design in which quantitative and qualitative data are collected in parallel, analyzed separately, and then merged for interpretation. The quantitative arm of the study will follow a matched-control quasi-experimental design using a waitlist control. Qualitative data will be collected using semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. The results of the study will help address the lack of rigorous evidence on approaches to prevent violence against children, broaden understanding of changes driven by community-led child protection approaches, and offer an example of how to overcome challenges in evaluating community-led and prevention approaches. • Evaluating a community-led child protection approach (Seeds) using a mixed-methods design. • The evaluation approach enhances understanding of changes in outcomes driven by community-led child protection approaches. • Findings of an earlier study on the community-led approach suggest a positive change among community leaders regarding child protection, such as increased agency of community members, especially youth, and identification of positive protective factors for children. • The community-led methodology draws on the WHO community engagement framework.

Child Protection and PracticeVol. 6
Save the Children (US), University of Cape Town (ZA), Universidad de Los Andes (CO), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), War Child (NL), Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (NL), Save the Children (BD), Netherlands Institute for Social Research (NL), Colombian Association of Surgery (CO), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.