Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Small, Solitary, Peripheral-Type Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Based on Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is not as widespread as LLR for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis, mainly because ICC may require a lymph node dissection (LND). However, small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC rarely have lymph node metastasis (LNM). The aim of the current study is to examine the usefulness of LLR for ICC and determine whether our criteria for applying LLR without LND to small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC was appropriate. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively selected 78 patients that underwent liver resections for ICC at Osaka University Hospital between 2003 and 2020. We compared LLR (<i>n</i> = 13) to open liver resection (OLR, <i>n</i> = 65) for short-term and long-term outcomes. We also analyzed a subgroup (<i>n</i> = 29) with small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The LLR group had less blood loss (<i>P</i> < .001), shorter postoperative stays (<i>P</i> < .001), and significantly higher 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS, 74.0%), compared to the OLR group (29.6%, <i>P</i> = .030). However, the OLR group included a higher proportion of patients with advanced ICC. Among patients with small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC, LLR (<i>n</i> = 10) was associated with less blood loss (<i>P</i> = .004) and shorter postoperative stays (<i>P</i> = .002), compared to OLR (<i>n</i> = 19). These groups had similar pathological findings, similar 5-year RFS (75.0% versus 56.8%; <i>P</i> = .433), and similar 5-year overall survival (75.0% versus 80.4%; <i>P</i> = .530). No patients that underwent LLR without LND for ICC experienced lymph node recurrence. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among patients with ICC, LLR provided better intraoperative and short-term outcomes than OLR, and comparable oncological outcomes. Furthermore, no patients that underwent LLR without LND for ICC experienced lymph node recurrence. LLR without LND for ICC can be performed safely and feasibly by selecting patients with small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2025.0031
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Small, Solitary, Peripheral-Type Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Based on Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis

Daisaku Yamada, Tadafumi Asaoka, Shogo Kobayashi, Hiroshi Wada et al.
1 citations
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
2.01
article

Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Small, Solitary, Peripheral-Type Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, Based on Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis

Daisaku Yamada, Tadafumi Asaoka, Shogo Kobayashi, Hiroshi Wada, Hirotoshi Takayama, Takehiro Noda, Hidenori Takahashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Yoshito Tomimaru, Kunihito Gotoh, Kazuki Sasaki, Masahiro Tanemura, Hirofumi Akita, Yuichiro Doki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Aim:</i></b> Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is not as widespread as LLR for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis, mainly because ICC may require a lymph node dissection (LND). However, small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC rarely have lymph node metastasis (LNM). The aim of the current study is to examine the usefulness of LLR for ICC and determine whether our criteria for applying LLR without LND to small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC was appropriate. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively selected 78 patients that underwent liver resections for ICC at Osaka University Hospital between 2003 and 2020. We compared LLR (<i>n</i> = 13) to open liver resection (OLR, <i>n</i> = 65) for short-term and long-term outcomes. We also analyzed a subgroup (<i>n</i> = 29) with small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The LLR group had less blood loss (<i>P</i> < .001), shorter postoperative stays (<i>P</i> < .001), and significantly higher 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS, 74.0%), compared to the OLR group (29.6%, <i>P</i> = .030). However, the OLR group included a higher proportion of patients with advanced ICC. Among patients with small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC, LLR (<i>n</i> = 10) was associated with less blood loss (<i>P</i> = .004) and shorter postoperative stays (<i>P</i> = .002), compared to OLR (<i>n</i> = 19). These groups had similar pathological findings, similar 5-year RFS (75.0% versus 56.8%; <i>P</i> = .433), and similar 5-year overall survival (75.0% versus 80.4%; <i>P</i> = .530). No patients that underwent LLR without LND for ICC experienced lymph node recurrence. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among patients with ICC, LLR provided better intraoperative and short-term outcomes than OLR, and comparable oncological outcomes. Furthermore, no patients that underwent LLR without LND for ICC experienced lymph node recurrence. LLR without LND for ICC can be performed safely and feasibly by selecting patients with small, solitary, peripheral-type ICC.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical TechniquesVol. 35(8)
Yamaguchi University (JP), Osaka National Hospital (JP), Osaka City General Hospital (JP), Osaka Police Hospital (JP), Kansai Rosai Hospital (JP), Osaka International Cancer Institute (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.