Techno-economic modeling framework to assess the feasibility of hydrogen-powered trains on non-electrified routes

The global transportation sector is under pressure to reduce its environmental impact, particularly greenhouse gas emissions. Rail transport is exploring innovative technologies to improve sustainability and reduce local pollution. This paper investigates the integration of fuel cell and battery technologies in hybrid fuel cell trains as a solution to decarbonize non-electrified routes. A model is developed to estimate hydrogen consumption, essential for operational planning and efficiency evaluation, alongside other key performance indicators. A Total Cost of Ownership (TCO, €/km) analysis is carried out to assess the economic viability compared to conventional diesel and electric trains. Additionally, an optimization approach is implemented to design the fuel cell and the battery sizes, with the goal of minimizing the TCO. The model is applied to a 103 km railway in northern Italy – the Brescia-Iseo-Edolo line – currently operating diesel trains, with plans to adopt fuel cell technology. Results show a hydrogen consumption of about 0.38 kg/km under beginning-of-life conditions, reducing fuel use by 46 % compared to diesel. Although the TCO of the hybrid fuel cell trains is currently higher than diesel multiple unit trains (+6 %), the analysis confirms the potential of hydrogen for regional rail where line electrification is not economically viable. • Hydrogen enables decarbonization of long, non-electrified railways with tough terrain. • Comprehensive TCO analysis compares hydrogen, diesel, and electric train options. • HMU trains cut energy use and emissions by integrating fuel cells and batteries. • HMU competitiveness improves as diesel prices rise and hydrogen costs decline.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Power Sources
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237677
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic modeling framework to assess the feasibility of hydrogen-powered trains on non-electrified routes

Massimo Santarelli, Paolo Marocco, Marta Gandiglio, Pierpaolo Cherchi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Power Sources
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
2.48
article

Techno-economic modeling framework to assess the feasibility of hydrogen-powered trains on non-electrified routes

Massimo Santarelli, Paolo Marocco, Marta Gandiglio, Pierpaolo Cherchi, Gabriele Peyrani
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The global transportation sector is under pressure to reduce its environmental impact, particularly greenhouse gas emissions. Rail transport is exploring innovative technologies to improve sustainability and reduce local pollution. This paper investigates the integration of fuel cell and battery technologies in hybrid fuel cell trains as a solution to decarbonize non-electrified routes. A model is developed to estimate hydrogen consumption, essential for operational planning and efficiency evaluation, alongside other key performance indicators. A Total Cost of Ownership (TCO, €/km) analysis is carried out to assess the economic viability compared to conventional diesel and electric trains. Additionally, an optimization approach is implemented to design the fuel cell and the battery sizes, with the goal of minimizing the TCO. The model is applied to a 103 km railway in northern Italy – the Brescia-Iseo-Edolo line – currently operating diesel trains, with plans to adopt fuel cell technology. Results show a hydrogen consumption of about 0.38 kg/km under beginning-of-life conditions, reducing fuel use by 46 % compared to diesel. Although the TCO of the hybrid fuel cell trains is currently higher than diesel multiple unit trains (+6 %), the analysis confirms the potential of hydrogen for regional rail where line electrification is not economically viable. • Hydrogen enables decarbonization of long, non-electrified railways with tough terrain. • Comprehensive TCO analysis compares hydrogen, diesel, and electric train options. • HMU trains cut energy use and emissions by integrating fuel cells and batteries. • HMU competitiveness improves as diesel prices rise and hydrogen costs decline.

Journal of Power SourcesVol. 652
Politecnico di Torino (IT), Costruzioni Apparecchiature Elettroniche Nucleari (Italy) (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.