Innovative Assessment Practices in Tertiary Education: Balancing Formative and Summative Methods for Diverse Student Populations

Tertiary education has evolved to accommodate a more diverse student demographic, including under-represented groups such as individuals with disabilities and non-traditional backgrounds. This shift necessitates assessment practices that do not disadvantage students based on attributes unrelated to the criteria being evaluated. Effective assessment should support all students equally in demonstrating their capabilities. However, the adaptation of assessment models to specific local contexts remains under-explored, despite its potential to enhance both academic and institutional effectiveness. Assessment serves dual purposes in tertiary education: facilitating student learning and certifying achievement. The design and processes of assessments are critical, yet many academics find it challenging to create effective assessment tasks. The literature highlights a persistent gap between assessment methods and actual student learning, with traditional written exams often criticized for their passive nature. Formative and summative assessments are two main categories used to evaluate student performance. Formative assessments provide ongoing feedback, enabling students to improve continuously, while summative assessments judge student achievements at the end of a module. Effective assessment strategies often blend both types to enhance learning outcomes. “Assessment for learning" emphasizes authentic assessments that focus on the learning process rather than merely assigning grades. Learning-oriented assessment integrates tasks as learning opportunities, self- and peer-assessment, and constructive feedback. Authentic assessments, such as real-life tasks, promote deeper understanding and application of knowledge. In the field of Biokinetics, work-integrated learning (WIL) is essential, offering students hands-on experience and immediate feedback. This approach aligns with formative assessment principles, promoting active involvement and real-world application. However, integrating traditional assessment methods with experiential learning poses challenges. Academics must align assessments with real-world situations and adapt to predesigned criteria to ensure effective evaluation. This review critically examines various assessment methods in tertiary education, aligning them with practices in the field of Biokinetics. The findings underscore the importance of authentic, learning-oriented assessments in fostering student development and achieving educational objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Higher Education
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v14n3p24
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative Assessment Practices in Tertiary Education: Balancing Formative and Summative Methods for Diverse Student Populations

Gerrit Jan Breukelman, Lourens Millard
International Journal of Higher Education
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Innovative Assessment Practices in Tertiary Education: Balancing Formative and Summative Methods for Diverse Student Populations

Gerrit Jan Breukelman, Lourens Millard
article en

Abstract

Tertiary education has evolved to accommodate a more diverse student demographic, including under-represented groups such as individuals with disabilities and non-traditional backgrounds. This shift necessitates assessment practices that do not disadvantage students based on attributes unrelated to the criteria being evaluated. Effective assessment should support all students equally in demonstrating their capabilities. However, the adaptation of assessment models to specific local contexts remains under-explored, despite its potential to enhance both academic and institutional effectiveness. Assessment serves dual purposes in tertiary education: facilitating student learning and certifying achievement. The design and processes of assessments are critical, yet many academics find it challenging to create effective assessment tasks. The literature highlights a persistent gap between assessment methods and actual student learning, with traditional written exams often criticized for their passive nature. Formative and summative assessments are two main categories used to evaluate student performance. Formative assessments provide ongoing feedback, enabling students to improve continuously, while summative assessments judge student achievements at the end of a module. Effective assessment strategies often blend both types to enhance learning outcomes. “Assessment for learning" emphasizes authentic assessments that focus on the learning process rather than merely assigning grades. Learning-oriented assessment integrates tasks as learning opportunities, self- and peer-assessment, and constructive feedback. Authentic assessments, such as real-life tasks, promote deeper understanding and application of knowledge. In the field of Biokinetics, work-integrated learning (WIL) is essential, offering students hands-on experience and immediate feedback. This approach aligns with formative assessment principles, promoting active involvement and real-world application. However, integrating traditional assessment methods with experiential learning poses challenges. Academics must align assessments with real-world situations and adapt to predesigned criteria to ensure effective evaluation. This review critically examines various assessment methods in tertiary education, aligning them with practices in the field of Biokinetics. The findings underscore the importance of authentic, learning-oriented assessments in fostering student development and achieving educational objectives.

International Journal of Higher EducationVol. 14(3)
University of Zululand (ZA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.