TableDC: Deep Clustering for Tabular Data

Deep clustering (DC), a fusion of deep representation learning and clustering, has recently demonstrated positive results in data science, particularly text processing and computer vision. However, joint optimization of feature learning and data distribution in the multi-dimensional space is domain-specific, so existing DC methods struggle to generalize to other application domains (such as data integration). In data management tasks, where high-density embeddings and overlapping clusters dominate, a data management-specific DC algorithm should be able to interact better with the data properties to support data integration tasks. This paper presents a deep clustering algorithm for tabular data (TableDC) that reflects the properties of data management applications that cluster tables (schema inference), rows (entity resolution) and columns (domain discovery). To address overlapping clusters, TableDC integrates Mahalanobis distance, which considers variance and correlation within the data, offering a similarity method suitable for tabular data in high-dimensional latent spaces. TableDC also shows higher tolerance to outliers through its heavy-tailed Cauchy distribution as the similarity kernel. The proposed similarity measure is particularly beneficial where the embeddings of raw data are densely packed and exhibit high degrees of overlap. Data integration tasks may also involve large numbers of clusters, which challenges the scalability of existing DC methods. TableDC learns data embeddings with a large number of clusters more efficiently than baseline DC methods, which scale in quadratic time. We evaluated TableDC with several existing DC, Standard Clustering (SC), and state-of-the-art bespoke methods over benchmark datasets. TableDC consistently outperforms existing DC, SC and bespoke methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3725366
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TableDC: Deep Clustering for Tabular Data

Norman W. Paton, Hafiz Tayyab Rauf
1 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
2.48
article

TableDC: Deep Clustering for Tabular Data

Norman W. Paton, Hafiz Tayyab Rauf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deep clustering (DC), a fusion of deep representation learning and clustering, has recently demonstrated positive results in data science, particularly text processing and computer vision. However, joint optimization of feature learning and data distribution in the multi-dimensional space is domain-specific, so existing DC methods struggle to generalize to other application domains (such as data integration). In data management tasks, where high-density embeddings and overlapping clusters dominate, a data management-specific DC algorithm should be able to interact better with the data properties to support data integration tasks. This paper presents a deep clustering algorithm for tabular data (TableDC) that reflects the properties of data management applications that cluster tables (schema inference), rows (entity resolution) and columns (domain discovery). To address overlapping clusters, TableDC integrates Mahalanobis distance, which considers variance and correlation within the data, offering a similarity method suitable for tabular data in high-dimensional latent spaces. TableDC also shows higher tolerance to outliers through its heavy-tailed Cauchy distribution as the similarity kernel. The proposed similarity measure is particularly beneficial where the embeddings of raw data are densely packed and exhibit high degrees of overlap. Data integration tasks may also involve large numbers of clusters, which challenges the scalability of existing DC methods. TableDC learns data embeddings with a large number of clusters more efficiently than baseline DC methods, which scale in quadratic time. We evaluated TableDC with several existing DC, Standard Clustering (SC), and state-of-the-art bespoke methods over benchmark datasets. TableDC consistently outperforms existing DC, SC and bespoke methods.

Proceedings of the ACM on Management of DataVol. 3(3)
University of Manchester (GB), Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

TableDC: Deep Clustering for Tabular Data — Norman W. Paton, Hafiz Tayyab Rauf · Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS