Freedom of Negativity: <scp>NAFTA</scp>'s Legal Form in the Logistical Borderlands

Abstract Capitalism is constituted through specific social forms that ground accumulation and mediate class struggle. This essay tracks capital's legal form through the labyrinthine uptake of trucking liberalisation amidst the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It argues that juridical contestation over NAFTA—known as the US–Mexico Trucking Dispute—both expresses and conceals class struggle between labour and capital on the one hand, and different fractions of capital on the other. The legal form of NAFTA binds workers into a condition of negative mobility or rather the non‐identity of capitalist motion and social organisation for use. At the same time, the legal form is inverted into the “neutral” realm of technical regulation through NAFTA's trucking liberalisation clause. Through a critique of reification, and an empirical unfolding of wage and labour conditions evidence, the essay explicates how living labour is thrown into the social retort of circulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antipode
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.70046
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freedom of Negativity: NAFTA's Legal Form in the Logistical Borderlands

Gerald M. Meier
1 citations
Antipode
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
article

Freedom of Negativity: NAFTA's Legal Form in the Logistical Borderlands

Gerald M. Meier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Capitalism is constituted through specific social forms that ground accumulation and mediate class struggle. This essay tracks capital's legal form through the labyrinthine uptake of trucking liberalisation amidst the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It argues that juridical contestation over NAFTA—known as the US–Mexico Trucking Dispute—both expresses and conceals class struggle between labour and capital on the one hand, and different fractions of capital on the other. The legal form of NAFTA binds workers into a condition of negative mobility or rather the non‐identity of capitalist motion and social organisation for use. At the same time, the legal form is inverted into the “neutral” realm of technical regulation through NAFTA's trucking liberalisation clause. Through a critique of reification, and an empirical unfolding of wage and labour conditions evidence, the essay explicates how living labour is thrown into the social retort of circulation.

AntipodeVol. 57(5)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), City University of New York (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Labor Movements and Unions
3.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Freedom of Negativity: <scp>NAFTA</scp>'s Legal Form in the Logistical Borderlands — Gerald M. Meier · Antipode (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS