Psychophysiological effects of walking in forests and urban built environments with disparate road traffic noise exposure: A randomized controlled trial

People in urbanized societies commonly visit greenspaces to alleviate stress and promote restoration and well-being. However, access to greenspaces is often limited and road traffic noise remains a major environmental stressor in urban areas. While various studies have compared the benefits of exposure to greenspaces and urban built environments, the role of traffic noise in shaping these effects remains understudied. This randomized, controlled field study compared the psychophysiological benefits of exposure to forests and urban built environments with different levels of road traffic noise in 354 healthy adults during 30-min walks in Zürich, Switzerland. A range of physiological and psychological outcomes were measured. Linear mixed-effects models showed that walking in forests, in environments with lower road traffic noise and longer relative quiet time without road traffic noise was associated with increased feelings of restoration, subjective stress recovery, and perceived restorativeness, compared to walking in urban built environments with higher road traffic noise as well as such with less relative quiet time. These associations were not observed for salivary cortisol and for attention, though cortisol levels decreased in all conditions, likely due to walking itself. Findings from quantitative and qualitative data on soundscape-induced positive and negative affect showed discrepancies, indicating a need for developing and using affective measures that include low activation affect. Our results suggest that even when noise exposure is relatively low, it can still impede subjective restoration and subjective stress recovery. This highlights the need for noise mapping and mitigation strategies to reduce noise exposure, specifically in public greenspaces. The results further underscore the importance of noise-free periods, without road traffic noise. When planning, designing, and/or preserving urban environments to support the well-being of inhabitants, road traffic noise as an impediment to subjective restoration and subjective stress recovery should be addressed. • Restoration and subjective stress recovery were higher after walks in forest vs. urban sites. • Neither environment nor road traffic noise affected physiological stress and attention. • Road traffic noise hinders subjective restoration, highlighting its negative impact. • Noise-free periods are important, going beyond a reduction in the average noise levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102662
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychophysiological effects of walking in forests and urban built environments with disparate road traffic noise exposure: A randomized controlled trial

Jean Marc Wunderli, Jakob Heimer, Nicole Bauer, Karin Hediger et al.
3 citations
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Noise Effects and Management
9.35
article

Psychophysiological effects of walking in forests and urban built environments with disparate road traffic noise exposure: A randomized controlled trial

Jean Marc Wunderli, Jakob Heimer, Nicole Bauer, Karin Hediger, Beat Schäffer, Silvia Tobias, Julia Schaupp
article en
3 citations

Abstract

People in urbanized societies commonly visit greenspaces to alleviate stress and promote restoration and well-being. However, access to greenspaces is often limited and road traffic noise remains a major environmental stressor in urban areas. While various studies have compared the benefits of exposure to greenspaces and urban built environments, the role of traffic noise in shaping these effects remains understudied. This randomized, controlled field study compared the psychophysiological benefits of exposure to forests and urban built environments with different levels of road traffic noise in 354 healthy adults during 30-min walks in Zürich, Switzerland. A range of physiological and psychological outcomes were measured. Linear mixed-effects models showed that walking in forests, in environments with lower road traffic noise and longer relative quiet time without road traffic noise was associated with increased feelings of restoration, subjective stress recovery, and perceived restorativeness, compared to walking in urban built environments with higher road traffic noise as well as such with less relative quiet time. These associations were not observed for salivary cortisol and for attention, though cortisol levels decreased in all conditions, likely due to walking itself. Findings from quantitative and qualitative data on soundscape-induced positive and negative affect showed discrepancies, indicating a need for developing and using affective measures that include low activation affect. Our results suggest that even when noise exposure is relatively low, it can still impede subjective restoration and subjective stress recovery. This highlights the need for noise mapping and mitigation strategies to reduce noise exposure, specifically in public greenspaces. The results further underscore the importance of noise-free periods, without road traffic noise. When planning, designing, and/or preserving urban environments to support the well-being of inhabitants, road traffic noise as an impediment to subjective restoration and subjective stress recovery should be addressed. • Restoration and subjective stress recovery were higher after walks in forest vs. urban sites. • Neither environment nor road traffic noise affected physiological stress and attention. • Road traffic noise hinders subjective restoration, highlighting its negative impact. • Noise-free periods are important, going beyond a reduction in the average noise levels.

Journal of Environmental PsychologyVol. 105
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (CH), University of Lucerne (CH), University of Basel (CH), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), University of Teacher Education Lucerne (CH), Department of Biomedicine Basel (CH), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH), Open University of the Netherlands (NL), Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Noise Effects and Management
9.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.