Project monitoring and control with an empirically grounded budget-release model

Project monitoring and control (PMC) is a process of measuring a project’s progress and taking corrective action when necessary to ensure successful project completion. However, most existing models lack empirical validation of their assumptions and effectiveness, which limits their practical use. We fill in this gap by using empirical data from 97 real projects to calibrate activity-duration distributions and assess activity-duration dependencies, integrating these empirical foundations into an enhanced PMC model. We further improve the model by incorporating budget-release timing constraints and introducing two new policies for crashing and fast-tracking based on a project’s specific time and cost characteristics. Extensive computational experiments using empirical and artificial data evaluate the effectiveness of these policies. Because the budget-release policies and corrective action types depend on project characteristics such as activity-duration dependencies and topological network structure, key insights from this study can be usefully applied by project managers as heuristics even without a detailed model of their project. • We provide empirical validations of project monitoring and control assumptions. • We examine how the size, timing and portion of budget-release impact project control. • The budget-release policies are examined on empirical and diverse artificial data. • The use of budget-release policies depends on cost profile and network structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Operational Research
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.06.007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Project monitoring and control with an empirically grounded budget-release model

Jinbo Song, Mario Vanhoucke, Tyson R. Browning, Jie Song
1 citations
European Journal of Operational Research
Construction Project Management and Performance
2.11
article

Project monitoring and control with an empirically grounded budget-release model

Jinbo Song, Mario Vanhoucke, Tyson R. Browning, Jie Song
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Project monitoring and control (PMC) is a process of measuring a project’s progress and taking corrective action when necessary to ensure successful project completion. However, most existing models lack empirical validation of their assumptions and effectiveness, which limits their practical use. We fill in this gap by using empirical data from 97 real projects to calibrate activity-duration distributions and assess activity-duration dependencies, integrating these empirical foundations into an enhanced PMC model. We further improve the model by incorporating budget-release timing constraints and introducing two new policies for crashing and fast-tracking based on a project’s specific time and cost characteristics. Extensive computational experiments using empirical and artificial data evaluate the effectiveness of these policies. Because the budget-release policies and corrective action types depend on project characteristics such as activity-duration dependencies and topological network structure, key insights from this study can be usefully applied by project managers as heuristics even without a detailed model of their project. • We provide empirical validations of project monitoring and control assumptions. • We examine how the size, timing and portion of budget-release impact project control. • The budget-release policies are examined on empirical and diverse artificial data. • The use of budget-release policies depends on cost profile and network structure.

European Journal of Operational ResearchVol. 328(2)
Texas Christian University (US), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Ghent University (BE), Vlerick Business School (BE), University College London (GB)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Construction Project Management and Performance
2.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.