Discovery of selective markers for chlorine gas exposure in concrete

Chlorine gas (Cl 2 ) is still being used as a chemical weapon in modern war zones. After an attack with this toxic chemical, verifying its use is challenging due to its reactivity and rapid evaporation. Additionally, only a limited number of selective markers relating to the use of chlorine gas are found. For forensic purposes it is necessary to discriminate Cl 2 from other chlorine containing chemicals. Therefore, the current study aims to use gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) together with machine learning methods to discover selective markers for chlorine gas exposure. Four types of concrete originating from Europe or the Middle East were exposed to various levels of Cl 2 as well as to some commonly used chlorine containing chemicals. After extraction with various solvents, the samples were analyzed. Based on the tentative identification of 32 chlorinated markers with GC–MS and 146 markers with LC-HRMS/MS, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were constructed. A clear distinction between concrete samples exposed to bleach and chlorine gas was apparent. For forensic classification, a Bayesian likelihood ratio (LR) model was applied that showed limited rates of misleading evidence and maximum LRs of 0.038 to 93. The markers chloroacetone, dichloroacetone, tetrachlorophenol, and 5-chloro-8-quinolinol were found to be selective for chlorine gas exposure. Their identity was verified by GC–MS/MS and LC-MS/MS in comparison with commercially available reference standards. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of chemical profiling in concrete to differentiate among various chlorinating agents. • Novel chlorine gas markers in concrete were identified by LC-HRMS/MS and GC–MS/MS. • Chloroquinolinol and (di)chloroacetone were identified using reference standards. • PCA and LDA facilitated classification of concrete exposed to its chlorinating agent. • Calibrated likelihood ratios were constructed for forensic discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forensic Chemistry
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forc.2025.100680
Primary Topic
Building materials and conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discovery of selective markers for chlorine gas exposure in concrete

Mirjam de Bruin-Hoegée, Marcel J. van der Schans, Latifa Lamriti, Jelle de Koning et al.
Forensic Chemistry
Building materials and conservation
article

Discovery of selective markers for chlorine gas exposure in concrete

Mirjam de Bruin-Hoegée, Marcel J. van der Schans, Latifa Lamriti, Jelle de Koning, Tomas van Groningen, Arian van Asten, Bence Dallos
article en

Abstract

Chlorine gas (Cl 2 ) is still being used as a chemical weapon in modern war zones. After an attack with this toxic chemical, verifying its use is challenging due to its reactivity and rapid evaporation. Additionally, only a limited number of selective markers relating to the use of chlorine gas are found. For forensic purposes it is necessary to discriminate Cl 2 from other chlorine containing chemicals. Therefore, the current study aims to use gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS/MS) together with machine learning methods to discover selective markers for chlorine gas exposure. Four types of concrete originating from Europe or the Middle East were exposed to various levels of Cl 2 as well as to some commonly used chlorine containing chemicals. After extraction with various solvents, the samples were analyzed. Based on the tentative identification of 32 chlorinated markers with GC–MS and 146 markers with LC-HRMS/MS, principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were constructed. A clear distinction between concrete samples exposed to bleach and chlorine gas was apparent. For forensic classification, a Bayesian likelihood ratio (LR) model was applied that showed limited rates of misleading evidence and maximum LRs of 0.038 to 93. The markers chloroacetone, dichloroacetone, tetrachlorophenol, and 5-chloro-8-quinolinol were found to be selective for chlorine gas exposure. Their identity was verified by GC–MS/MS and LC-MS/MS in comparison with commercially available reference standards. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility of chemical profiling in concrete to differentiate among various chlorinating agents. • Novel chlorine gas markers in concrete were identified by LC-HRMS/MS and GC–MS/MS. • Chloroquinolinol and (di)chloroacetone were identified using reference standards. • PCA and LDA facilitated classification of concrete exposed to its chlorinating agent. • Calibrated likelihood ratios were constructed for forensic discrimination.

Forensic ChemistryVol. 45
Ministry of Defence (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken, Ministerie van Defensie
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Building materials and conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.