Individual differences in spatial navigation and working memory

Spatial navigation is a complex skill that relies on many aspects of cognition. Our study aims to clarify the role of working memory in spatial navigation, and particularly, the potentially separate contributions of verbal and visuospatial working memory. We leverage individual differences to understand how working memory differs among types of navigators and the predictive utility of verbal and visuospatial working memory. Data were analyzed from N = 253 healthy, young adults. Participants completed multiple measures of verbal and visuospatial working memory and a spatial navigation task called Virtual Silcton. We found that better navigators may rely more on visuospatial working memory. Additionally, using a relative weights analysis, we found that visuospatial working memory accounts for a large majority of variance in spatial navigation when compared to verbal working memory. Our results suggest individual differences in working memory are domain-specific in this context of spatial navigation, with visuospatial working memory being the primary contributor. • Better navigators have higher verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM). • Visuospatial WM is a better predictor of spatial navigation compared to verbal WM. • Verbal and visuospatial WM are domain-specific in the context of spatial navigation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligence
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2025.101932
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual differences in spatial navigation and working memory

Thomas S. Redick, Alexa K. Bushinski
1 citations
Intelligence
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
article

Individual differences in spatial navigation and working memory

Thomas S. Redick, Alexa K. Bushinski
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Spatial navigation is a complex skill that relies on many aspects of cognition. Our study aims to clarify the role of working memory in spatial navigation, and particularly, the potentially separate contributions of verbal and visuospatial working memory. We leverage individual differences to understand how working memory differs among types of navigators and the predictive utility of verbal and visuospatial working memory. Data were analyzed from N = 253 healthy, young adults. Participants completed multiple measures of verbal and visuospatial working memory and a spatial navigation task called Virtual Silcton. We found that better navigators may rely more on visuospatial working memory. Additionally, using a relative weights analysis, we found that visuospatial working memory accounts for a large majority of variance in spatial navigation when compared to verbal working memory. Our results suggest individual differences in working memory are domain-specific in this context of spatial navigation, with visuospatial working memory being the primary contributor. • Better navigators have higher verbal and visuospatial working memory (WM). • Visuospatial WM is a better predictor of spatial navigation compared to verbal WM. • Verbal and visuospatial WM are domain-specific in the context of spatial navigation.

IntelligenceVol. 111
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate, Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Spatial Cognition and Navigation
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.