Imaginaries of the Brazilian Diplomatic Discourse

This study examines the frequency and manner in which Celso Amorim mobilizes left-wing sociocultural imaginaries in his official discourses, considering Charaudeau’s (2016) semiolinguistic perspective. As part of a broader research project analyzing 20 years of official discourses by Brazilian chancellors – from the first Lula government to the Bolsonaro administration – this article specifically focuses on Celso Amorim and on the theme of political ideology. The research is based on theoretical categories of discourse analysis, particularly Charaudeau’s (2016) model, and incorporates the notion of Culture Wars, as conceived by Hunter (1991), to explore ideological tensions in diplomatic discourse. Initially, the study sought to catalog the constants of the so-called “Rhetoric of Cultural War,” a category of analysis we developed for examining discursive clashes in polarized contexts such as culture wars. Subsequently, after describing the quantitative findings, representative excerpts of the results were qualitatively analyzed through the lens of the aforementioned theoretical frameworks. The conclusions indicate that Amorim consistently employed a left-wing political discourse, albeit without adopting a confrontational approach, aligning with the traditional pragmatism and universalism of Brazilian diplomacy. This study thus aims to contribute to the understanding of Brazilian diplomatic discourse – a field still little explored in linguistic studies – while also offering reflections on the ideological dimensions of foreign policy rhetoric conveyed in these discourses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.33.1.220-237
Primary Topic
International Relations in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imaginaries of the Brazilian Diplomatic Discourse

Frederico Rios C. dos Santos Tostes de Arantes
Revista de Estudos da Linguagem
International Relations in Latin America
article

Imaginaries of the Brazilian Diplomatic Discourse

Frederico Rios C. dos Santos Tostes de Arantes
article en

Abstract

This study examines the frequency and manner in which Celso Amorim mobilizes left-wing sociocultural imaginaries in his official discourses, considering Charaudeau’s (2016) semiolinguistic perspective. As part of a broader research project analyzing 20 years of official discourses by Brazilian chancellors – from the first Lula government to the Bolsonaro administration – this article specifically focuses on Celso Amorim and on the theme of political ideology. The research is based on theoretical categories of discourse analysis, particularly Charaudeau’s (2016) model, and incorporates the notion of Culture Wars, as conceived by Hunter (1991), to explore ideological tensions in diplomatic discourse. Initially, the study sought to catalog the constants of the so-called “Rhetoric of Cultural War,” a category of analysis we developed for examining discursive clashes in polarized contexts such as culture wars. Subsequently, after describing the quantitative findings, representative excerpts of the results were qualitatively analyzed through the lens of the aforementioned theoretical frameworks. The conclusions indicate that Amorim consistently employed a left-wing political discourse, albeit without adopting a confrontational approach, aligning with the traditional pragmatism and universalism of Brazilian diplomacy. This study thus aims to contribute to the understanding of Brazilian diplomatic discourse – a field still little explored in linguistic studies – while also offering reflections on the ideological dimensions of foreign policy rhetoric conveyed in these discourses.

Revista de Estudos da LinguagemVol. 33(1)
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
International Relations in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.