Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy

• Socioecological marginality can be functional to investment in wind energy production. • Socioecological marginality can boost profit margins in the wind energy sector. • Socioecological marginality can be leveraged to legitimise profit extraction in wind energy production. • Socioecological marginality works as a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix for accumulation in the wind energy sector. • Wind energy production under capitalism exploits historically socioecological inequalities. Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy. I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe. At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials. As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level. In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104344
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy

Samadhi Lipari
1 citations
Geoforum
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
article

Socioecological marginality as a fix: leveraging inequality to valorise and legitimise capital in Southern Italy industrial-scale wind energy

Samadhi Lipari
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Socioecological marginality can be functional to investment in wind energy production. • Socioecological marginality can boost profit margins in the wind energy sector. • Socioecological marginality can be leveraged to legitimise profit extraction in wind energy production. • Socioecological marginality works as a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix for accumulation in the wind energy sector. • Wind energy production under capitalism exploits historically socioecological inequalities. Is socioecological marginality functional or dysfunctional to investment in wind energy? If marginality is functionally embedded in investment schemes, what is its role within the wider accumulation dynamic? I address these questions by applying the lens of historical materialist political economy to a case study of industrial-scale wind energy at the edge of European capitalism: the Apulo-Campano Apennine in Southern Italy. I argue that marginality is functional to wind energy investment for two reasons. First, it reduces the cost of accessing the lands where winds enable turbines to spin. Second, it offers a rationale that justifies capital accumulation, framing it as the solution to both local underdevelopment and the global climate catastrophe. At a higher level, socioecological marginality works as both a spatiotemporal and socioecological fix. On the one hand, it ensures that capital surpluses invested in wind energy are sufficiently valorised. On the other hand, it extends the hegemony of the underlying socioecological relations under the guise of ‘green’ and social credentials. As a corollary, I show that both fixes are operationalised by territorially based alliances amongst classes, groups, and institutions that capture surplus value in and around wind energy. These systems of sociotechnical cooperation redistribute incomes and privilege in alignment with power relations as they occur at the territorial level. In exploring how socioecological marginality and capital accumulation influence each other, the paper shows how the exploitation and crystallisation of historically determined inequalities function as a key element of wind energy generation under capitalism.

GeoforumVol. 164
University of Catania (IT)
University of Manchester, University of Leeds, Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
4.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.