Scalable Agile Frameworks: Comparing Safe, Less, And Nexus for Enterprise Adoption

This study aims to identify and systematically compare the main large-scale agile frameworks that companies can adopt to manage the work of large scale and distributed teams. The companies can consciously perform better decision on the choice of the framework that fits the practices and challenges of their organizations. The work employs a qualitative approach supporting an exploratory analysis identifying the processes of migration to large scale agile. First the assessment criteria for scaling agile are discussed. Second these criteria used to perform a comparative analysis fo 3 large scale agile frameworks i.e. SAFe, LeSS and Nexus. The findings reveal there isn’t a dominant large scale agile framework in all dimensions. However, framework like Nexus offer low technical complexity accommodating the changes easily while other frameworks like SAFe offer high level of scalability more demanding and deep efforts changing work processes in organization.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Engineering And Technology
Published
2025-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/volume07issue06-15
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Collaboration in agile enterprises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scalable Agile Frameworks: Comparing Safe, Less, And Nexus for Enterprise Adoption

1 citations
The American Journal of Engineering And Technology
Collaboration in agile enterprises
2.76
article

Scalable Agile Frameworks: Comparing Safe, Less, And Nexus for Enterprise Adoption

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aims to identify and systematically compare the main large-scale agile frameworks that companies can adopt to manage the work of large scale and distributed teams. The companies can consciously perform better decision on the choice of the framework that fits the practices and challenges of their organizations. The work employs a qualitative approach supporting an exploratory analysis identifying the processes of migration to large scale agile. First the assessment criteria for scaling agile are discussed. Second these criteria used to perform a comparative analysis fo 3 large scale agile frameworks i.e. SAFe, LeSS and Nexus. The findings reveal there isn’t a dominant large scale agile framework in all dimensions. However, framework like Nexus offer low technical complexity accommodating the changes easily while other frameworks like SAFe offer high level of scalability more demanding and deep efforts changing work processes in organization.

The American Journal of Engineering And TechnologyVol. 07(06)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Collaboration in agile enterprises
2.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.