Long-term Future and Non-anthropocentric Value
Abstract Longtermism, the view that emphasizes the importance of the long-term consequences of our actions, has predominantly been focused on humans. Gary O’Brien (2024) argues that this is a mistake and instead, longtermism should be animal inclusive. While I find merit in O’Brien’s core argument, I offer critiques to certain aspects of it in this article. Moreover, in the spirit of extending the sphere of moral considerability, I believe that we should also consider longtermism for environmental values more widely. This article proposes a non-anthropocentric approach to longtermism that acknowledges not only sentient animals but also ecological systems and all forms of life to invoke a more diverse discussion about longtermism. It also explores potentially effective interventions that such an extended perspective might yield.
Authors
- Oskari Sivula (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6975-5223)
Institutions
- University of Turku (FI)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Moral Philosophy
- Published
- 2025-06-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20254639
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.31