Redistribution and Exclusion: Value Articulations in the Populist Moment

Was the populist moment of the 2010s also a redistributive moment, marked by popular support for equalizing incomes? To what extent did support for redistribution align with exclusionary values that scholars frequently associate with right-wing populism? Building on the neo-Gramscian theory of Stuart Hall, we use the World Values Survey to track post-2008 shifts in what we call ‘value articulations’: specific combinations of attitudes, in this case towards redistribution and the inclusion or exclusion of immigrants and racial or ethnic others. Support for redistribution increased across the globe after 2008. Exclusionary values remained relatively constant, but they increasingly combined with support for redistribution. Inclusionary and exclusionary redistributors shared a distrust of major institutions, but differed on the importance of democracy and cultural issues such as homosexuality and abortion. Our findings illuminate the contours of an unfolding struggle between inclusionary and exclusionary forces on the terrain of economic redistribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Sociology
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205251349167
Primary Topic
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Redistribution and Exclusion: Value Articulations in the Populist Moment

Marcel Paret, Michael Levien
Critical Sociology
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
article

Redistribution and Exclusion: Value Articulations in the Populist Moment

Marcel Paret, Michael Levien
article en

Abstract

Was the populist moment of the 2010s also a redistributive moment, marked by popular support for equalizing incomes? To what extent did support for redistribution align with exclusionary values that scholars frequently associate with right-wing populism? Building on the neo-Gramscian theory of Stuart Hall, we use the World Values Survey to track post-2008 shifts in what we call ‘value articulations’: specific combinations of attitudes, in this case towards redistribution and the inclusion or exclusion of immigrants and racial or ethnic others. Support for redistribution increased across the globe after 2008. Exclusionary values remained relatively constant, but they increasingly combined with support for redistribution. Inclusionary and exclusionary redistributors shared a distrust of major institutions, but differed on the importance of democracy and cultural issues such as homosexuality and abortion. Our findings illuminate the contours of an unfolding struggle between inclusionary and exclusionary forces on the terrain of economic redistribution.

Critical Sociology
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Utah (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Populism, Right-Wing Movements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Redistribution and Exclusion: Value Articulations in the Populist Moment — Marcel Paret, Michael Levien · Critical Sociology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS